Cefalu C A, Ettinger W H, Espeland M
Department of Internal Medicine, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996 Jun;44(6):654-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01827.x.
To determine if basic differences exist between the patients and caregivers of a representative group of dementia-nonspecific medical versus social adult day care centers with specific programs for dementia patients.
A telephone interview questionnaire survey.
North Central North Carolina.
A total of 242 adult day care dementia patients and caregivers from three medical and three social nondementia-specific adult day care centers.
Dementia patient variables: Day care subtype (medical or social); length of stay; number of days attended; age; sex; race; educational level; marital status; religious affiliation; income; living status; number of medical conditions; number of prescription medications; function; ADL status (walking, eating, bathing, dressing, grooming, toileting); continence status; number and type of abnormal behaviors; formal help status (hospitalization during day care, part or full-time nursing home attendance, or home healthcare assistance); transportation; and financial assistance. Caregiver variables: day care subtype; age; sex; race; educational level; marital status; religious affiliation; income; number of medical conditions; number of prescription medications; informal help (family friends or other non-paid help); paid help (friend, other, home health, or nursing home); relationship to patient; employment status; and level of caregiver burden.
There were 144 medical and 62 social adult day care dementia patients and caregivers who agreed to participate. The average age of the patient was 77.9 years (SD +/- 8.4), and that of the caregiver was 57.7 years (SD +/- 13.9); 68.4% of the patients and 75.4% of the caregivers were females. Dementia patients in the medical subtype day care had a shorter length of stay than social day care patients; this did not reach statistical significance. There were significantly more white patients and caregivers in the medical than in the social subtype day care, 83.1% versus 50% and 83.3% versus 50.8%, respectively. Dementia patients of the medical subtype also had significantly more education, income, less function, and more symptoms of depression than dementia patients in the social subtype. Dementia patients of the medical subtype also had more abnormal psychological behaviors than their social subtype counterparts, with borderline significance (P = .071). There were more married caregivers in the medical subtype than in the social subtype day care. Caregivers of dementia patients in the medical subtype had significantly more paid help and caregiver burden than did caregivers of dementia patients in the social subtype.
In this study, there appear to be key differences between the dementia patients and caregivers of medical versus social adult day care centers as to demographic and health-related variables. The differences in demographic variables appear to be associated with socioeconomic factors, whereas the decreased function and greater number of depressive symptoms of the medical dementia patients may reflect poorer health as reflected by the greater amount of paid help and increased caregiver burden experienced by the caregivers of medical dementia patients. These findings should be verified in prospective studies.
确定在为痴呆症患者设有特定项目的具有代表性的非特异性痴呆症医疗与社会成人日托中心中,患者与照料者之间是否存在基本差异。
电话访谈问卷调查。
北卡罗来纳州中北部。
来自三个医疗和三个非痴呆症特异性社会成人日托中心的总共242名成人日托痴呆症患者及照料者。
痴呆症患者变量:日托类型(医疗或社会);停留时间;参加天数;年龄;性别;种族;教育程度;婚姻状况;宗教信仰;收入;生活状况;医疗状况数量;处方药数量;功能;日常生活活动能力状态(行走、进食、洗澡、穿衣、修饰、如厕);大小便失禁状态;异常行为的数量和类型;正式帮助状态(日托期间住院、部分或全日制养老院照料或家庭医疗护理);交通;以及经济援助。照料者变量:日托类型;年龄;性别;种族;教育程度;婚姻状况;宗教信仰;收入;医疗状况数量;处方药数量;非正式帮助(家人、朋友或其他无偿帮助);有偿帮助(朋友、其他、家庭健康护理或养老院);与患者的关系;就业状况;以及照料者负担水平。
共有144名医疗成人日托痴呆症患者及照料者和62名社会成人日托痴呆症患者及照料者同意参与。患者的平均年龄为77.9岁(标准差±8.4),照料者的平均年龄为57.7岁(标准差±13.9);68.4%的患者和75.4%的照料者为女性。医疗型日托中的痴呆症患者停留时间比社会型日托患者短;但未达到统计学显著性。医疗型日托中的白人患者及照料者显著多于社会型日托,分别为83.1%对50%以及83.3%对50.8%。医疗型日托的痴呆症患者比社会型日托的痴呆症患者受教育程度显著更高、收入更高、功能更差且抑郁症状更多。医疗型日托的痴呆症患者比社会型日托的对应患者有更多异常心理行为,具有临界显著性(P = 0.071)。医疗型日托中的已婚照料者比社会型日托中的更多。医疗型日托痴呆症患者的照料者比社会型日托痴呆症患者的照料者有显著更多的有偿帮助和照料者负担。
在本研究中,医疗与社会成人日托中心的痴呆症患者及照料者在人口统计学和健康相关变量方面似乎存在关键差异。人口统计学变量的差异似乎与社会经济因素相关,而医疗型痴呆症患者功能下降和抑郁症状更多可能反映出健康状况较差,这体现在医疗型痴呆症患者的照料者有更多的有偿帮助和更高的照料者负担。这些发现应在前瞻性研究中得到验证。