Boman K, Bodegård G
Department of Psychology, Stockholm University.
Acta Paediatr. 1995 Dec;84(12):1395-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1995.tb13576.x.
Childhood cancer, although cured, may have long-term psychological consequences for the adult survivor. The outcome of patients' coping with the illness and treatment experience was assessed in relation to a theoretical model describing optimal long-term coping with a potential psychic trauma of this nature. Thirty young adult childhood cancer survivors were studied. The average age at diagnosis was 8 years, and at evaluation 22 years. The average time since diagnosis was 13 years. The evaluations of coping were carried out independently by two psychologists, who rated material from semistructured in-depth interviews. By statistical cluster analysis three clusters were produced that could be interpreted as exhibiting "good," "intermediate" and "poor" coping, containing 40, 33, and 27%, respectively, of the total group. Overall cluster differences were statistically significant. Profile analysis revealed statistical stability and internal homogeneity in the good coping cluster and the poor coping cluster.
儿童癌症患者即便已治愈,成年幸存者仍可能面临长期的心理问题。本研究依据一个描述如何最佳应对此类潜在精神创伤的理论模型,评估了患者应对疾病及治疗经历的结果。研究对象为30名童年期患癌的年轻成年幸存者。诊断时的平均年龄为8岁,评估时为22岁。自诊断以来的平均时长为13年。两位心理学家独立开展了应对评估,他们对来自半结构化深度访谈的材料进行评分。通过统计聚类分析,产生了三个聚类,可分别解释为表现出“良好”“中等”和“较差”应对方式,分别占总样本的40%、33%和27%。聚类间的总体差异具有统计学意义。剖面分析显示,良好应对聚类和较差应对聚类具有统计稳定性和内部同质性。