Aldridge Arianna A, Roesch Scott C
San Diego, Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University, and University California, San Diego, CA, USA.
J Behav Med. 2007 Apr;30(2):115-29. doi: 10.1007/s10865-006-9087-y. Epub 2006 Dec 20.
The current meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of coping strategies on psychological and physical adjustment in children with cancer (n = 1230). Coping strategies were operationalized in accordance with two coping taxonomies; the first is based on the general orientation of the child's coping attempts (approach or avoidance), and the second is based upon coping efforts to regulate the stressor and/or feelings of distress attributed to it (problem-focused and emotion-focused). Approach, avoidance, and emotion-focused coping were unrelated to overall adjustment. A small-to-medium but negative association was found between problem-focused coping and adjustment, indicating more use of the strategies that compose this dimension are associated with poorer adjustment. However, homogeneity analyses also indicated significant variation for all of these effect sizes. Follow-up moderator analyses found coping-adjustment relations were both dependent upon time since diagnosis and the particular stressor the child was dealing with during treatment.
当前的荟萃分析评估了应对策略对癌症患儿(n = 1230)心理和身体调适的效果。应对策略是根据两种应对分类法来实施的;第一种基于儿童应对尝试的总体取向(接近或回避),第二种基于调节应激源和/或归因于它的痛苦情绪的应对努力(问题聚焦和情绪聚焦)。接近、回避和情绪聚焦应对与总体调适无关。在问题聚焦应对与调适之间发现了小到中等程度的负相关,这表明构成这一维度的策略使用得越多,与越差的调适相关。然而,同质性分析也表明所有这些效应大小都存在显著差异。后续的调节因素分析发现,应对与调适的关系既取决于诊断后的时间,也取决于儿童在治疗期间所应对的特定应激源。