Suppr超能文献

对接受小肠活检的儿童经鼻与静脉注射咪达唑仑的比较。

Intranasal versus intravenous administration of midazolam to children undergoing small bowel biopsy.

作者信息

Högberg L, Nordvall M, Tjellström B, Stenhammar L

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Norrköping Hospital, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Paediatr. 1995 Dec;84(12):1429-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1995.tb13582.x.

Abstract

Sixty-three children under the age of 9 years were randomized to receive intravenous (group A, n = 33) or intranasal (group B, n = 30) midazolam as sedation for small bowel biopsy. Mean doses of midazolam given to produce adequate sedation were 0.31 mg (kg body weight)-1 in group A and 0.34 mg (kg body weight)-1 in group B (NS). Four children in group A and 10 children in group B required additional doses to maintain adequate sedation throughout the biopsy procedure (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups regarding the median procedure time (7 min in group A, 8.5 min in group B) or median fluoroscopy time (5 s in group A, 4 s in group B). All children in group B showed signs of discomfort from the nose when given midazolam intranasally. In conclusion, this study indicates that intravenous administration of midazolam is preferable to the intranasal route.

摘要

63名9岁以下儿童被随机分组,分别接受静脉注射咪达唑仑(A组,n = 33)或鼻内给予咪达唑仑(B组,n = 30)以用于小肠活检镇静。A组为达到充分镇静给予的咪达唑仑平均剂量为0.31 mg/(kg体重),B组为0.34 mg/(kg体重)(无显著差异)。A组4名儿童和B组10名儿童在整个活检过程中需要额外剂量以维持充分镇静(p < 0.05)。两组之间在中位操作时间(A组7分钟,B组8.5分钟)或中位透视时间(A组5秒,B组4秒)方面无显著差异。B组所有儿童在鼻内给予咪达唑仑时均出现鼻部不适迹象。总之,本研究表明静脉注射咪达唑仑优于鼻内给药途径。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验