Suppr超能文献

口服格拉司琼两种剂量方案预防中度致吐性化疗患者急性呕吐疗效的双盲比较。

A double-blind comparison of the efficacy of two dose regimens of oral granisetron in preventing acute emesis in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

作者信息

Ettinger D S, Eisenberg P D, Fitts D, Friedman C, Wilson-Lynch K, Yocom K

机构信息

The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 1996 Jul 1;78(1):144-51. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960701)78:1<144::AID-CNCR20>3.0.CO;2-Z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to define an optimal administration schedule of granisetron for patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy by comparing the antiemetic efficacy and safety of 2 mg of the drug administrated orally.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomized, parallel study, 2-dose regimens of oral granisetron were evaluated in 697 adult cancer patients. Patients were stratified by gender and randomized to receive 2 mg oral granisetron, either as a divided dose given 1 hour prior to chemotherapy and 12 hours after the start of chemotherapy, or as a single dose 1 hour prior to chemotherapy at Cycle 1. The primary efficacy endpoints assessed were the percentage of patients with complete response (no nausea, no emesis, and no additional antiemetic medication during the 24-hour post-chemotherapy interval) and the incidence of emesis and nausea. Following completion of Cycle 1, patients were given the opportunity to receive open-label granisetron (2 mg once daily) on the first day of each remaining cycle of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences in any of the endpoints were observed between the two treatment groups. Approximately 50% of patients in both treatment groups achieved complete response. The proportion of patients with no episodes of emesis occurred with similar frequency in the two treatment groups. Approximately 52% of patients in either treatment group were free of nausea during the postchemotherapy period. There was no difference between treatment groups regarding the use of antiemetic rescue medication. Finally, the incidence of adverse experiences was similar for both treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both dose regimens of oral granisetron were similarly effective in controlling nausea and vomiting in the 24-hour interval following chemotherapy. Granisetron was well tolerated with few adverse events attributable to the study drug.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是通过比较口服2毫克格拉司琼的止吐疗效和安全性,为接受中度致吐性化疗的患者确定最佳给药方案。

方法

在这项双盲、随机、平行研究中,对697名成年癌症患者评估了两种口服格拉司琼给药方案。患者按性别分层,随机接受2毫克口服格拉司琼,要么在化疗前1小时和化疗开始后12小时分剂量给药,要么在第1周期化疗前1小时单次给药。评估的主要疗效终点是完全缓解患者的百分比(化疗后24小时内无恶心、无呕吐且未使用额外的止吐药物)以及呕吐和恶心的发生率。在第1周期完成后,患者有机会在每个剩余化疗周期的第一天接受开放标签的格拉司琼(每日一次,2毫克)。

结果

两个治疗组在任何终点上均未观察到统计学上的显著差异。两个治疗组中约50%的患者实现了完全缓解。两个治疗组中无呕吐发作的患者比例出现频率相似。两个治疗组中约52%的患者在化疗后期间无恶心。治疗组在使用止吐救援药物方面没有差异。最后,两个治疗组的不良事件发生率相似。

结论

两种口服格拉司琼给药方案在化疗后24小时内控制恶心和呕吐方面同样有效。格拉司琼耐受性良好,归因于研究药物的不良事件很少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验