Suppr超能文献

口服格拉司琼与口服丙氯拉嗪预防中度致吐性化疗患者恶心和呕吐的疗效及安全性比较

Efficacy and safety of oral granisetron versus oral prochlorperazine in preventing nausea and emesis in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

作者信息

Burris H, Hesketh P, Cohn J, Moriconi W, Ryan T, Friedman C, Fitts D

机构信息

Clinical Investigations Office, Cancer Therapy and Research Center, San Antonio 78229, USA.

出版信息

Cancer J Sci Am. 1996 Mar-Apr;2(2):85-90.

PMID:9166505
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of oral granisetron hydrochloride tablets with that of oral prochlorperazine sustained-release capsules in preventing nausea and emesis induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapeutic agents.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study, oral granisetron and oral prochlorperazine were compared in 230 chemotherapy-naive, adult cancer patients who received moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Patients were stratified by gender and randomized to receive either 1.0 mg oral granisetron HCI twice a day for 7 days, or 10 mg oral prochlorperazine sustained-release capsules twice a day for 7 days. The first dose was given 1 hour before initiation of chemotherapy and the second dose 12 hours after the first dose. Patients were evaluated for emetic episodes, extent of nausea, and adverse events for 7 days after the start of chemotherapy. Primary efficacy parameters were complete response (no emetic episodes, no greater than mild nausea, no antiemetic rescue) and total control (no emetic episodes, no nausea, no antiemetic rescue) in the 24 hours after the start of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Granisetron was significantly more effective than prochlorperazine in achieving a complete response (74% vs. 41%, respectively) and total control of nausea and vomiting (58% vs. 33%, respectively) at the 24-hour assessment. Complete response at 24 hours was significantly higher in the granisetron-treated patients than in prochlorperazine-treated patients. In women, granisetron showed a complete response rate of 69% versus 38% with prochlorperazine; in men, granisetron showed a complete response rate of 92% versus 61% with prochlorperazine. Both regimens were well tolerated, with headache (36% for granisetron, 29% for prochlorperazine) and constipation (31% for granisetron, 6% for prochlorperazine) the most common adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

: Oral granisetron 1 mg twice a day was significantly more effective than oral prochlorperazine sustained release capsules 10 mg twice a day in complete response and total control of nausea and vomiting at 24 hours after chemotherapy. Both agents were well tolerated.

摘要

目的

比较口服盐酸格拉司琼片与口服丙氯拉嗪缓释胶囊预防中度致吐性化疗药物引起的恶心和呕吐的疗效及安全性。

患者与方法

在这项多中心、双盲、随机、平行组研究中,对230例未接受过化疗的成年癌症患者进行了口服格拉司琼与口服丙氯拉嗪的比较,这些患者接受中度致吐性化疗。患者按性别分层,随机分为两组,一组每天两次口服1.0毫克盐酸格拉司琼,共7天;另一组每天两次口服10毫克丙氯拉嗪缓释胶囊,共7天。首剂在化疗开始前1小时服用,第二剂在首剂后12小时服用。化疗开始后7天对患者的呕吐发作情况、恶心程度及不良事件进行评估。主要疗效参数为化疗开始后24小时内的完全缓解(无呕吐发作、恶心程度不超过轻度、无需使用止吐解救药物)和完全控制(无呕吐发作、无恶心、无需使用止吐解救药物)。

结果

在24小时评估时,格拉司琼在实现完全缓解(分别为74%和41%)以及完全控制恶心和呕吐(分别为58%和33%)方面明显比丙氯拉嗪更有效。格拉司琼治疗组患者24小时时的完全缓解率明显高于丙氯拉嗪治疗组患者。在女性中,格拉司琼的完全缓解率为69%,而丙氯拉嗪为38%;在男性中,格拉司琼的完全缓解率为92%,而丙氯拉嗪为61%。两种治疗方案耐受性均良好,最常见的不良事件为头痛(格拉司琼组为36%,丙氯拉嗪组为29%)和便秘(格拉司琼组为31%,丙氯拉嗪组为6%)。

结论

化疗后24小时,每天两次口服1毫克格拉司琼在完全缓解及完全控制恶心和呕吐方面明显比每天两次口服10毫克丙氯拉嗪缓释胶囊更有效。两种药物耐受性均良好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验