Radowicki S, Horoszko-Husiatyńska B
Kliniki Endokrynologii Ginekologicznej AM w Warszawie.
Ginekol Pol. 1995 Dec;66(12):689-91.
It has been presented comparative studies of biopsies by means of two above mentioned probes in outpatients. It has been assessed the quality and quantity of obtained histopathological specimens and it has been compared relative pain perception during procedure among patients. Micro-curettage was performed twice in each woman. In the first group--the first curettage with Novak's probe and the second one the Pipelle's probe; in the second group--conversely. Aspirated endometrium was studied histopathologically. It has not been obtained specimen in 5 cases using Pipelle's probe that means in 20.83%; using Novak's probe in 25.0%. Microcuretage with Pipelle's probe was described as painless by 37.5% patients. The procedure with Novak's probe was always more or less painful. It has been found that both types of ++micro-curettage have the same effectiveness allowing to obtain histopathological specimens. It has been noticed that Pipelle's probe ensured higher comfort that means it has been more painless. It is a disposable probe giving full sterility of performing procedure.
在门诊患者中,对使用上述两种探头进行活检的情况进行了比较研究。评估了所获得的组织病理学标本的质量和数量,并比较了患者在操作过程中的相对疼痛感受。每位女性均进行了两次微型刮宫术。在第一组中,第一次刮宫使用诺瓦克探头,第二次使用派普乐探头;在第二组中,顺序相反。对吸出的子宫内膜进行组织病理学研究。使用派普乐探头时,有5例未获得标本,占20.83%;使用诺瓦克探头时,未获得标本的比例为25.0%。37.5%的患者称使用派普乐探头进行微型刮宫术时无痛。使用诺瓦克探头的操作或多或少总会引起疼痛。已发现两种类型的微型刮宫术在获取组织病理学标本方面具有相同的有效性。已注意到派普乐探头能确保更高的舒适度,也就是说它更无痛。它是一次性探头,能使操作过程完全无菌。