Gulba D C
Franz-Volhard-Klinik am Max-Delbrück-Zentrum für Molekulare Medizin, Klinikum Rudolf Virchow, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
Herz. 1996 Feb;21(1):12-27.
In todays medicine, anticoagulant drugs like heparin and coumadin derivatives have become indispensable for the treatment of thrombo-embolic diseases. Heparin, consisting of long poly-sulfated polysaccharide chains of variable length and sequences is mostly derived from porcine mucosa. Its bioavailability by other than the parenteral way of administration is almost negligible. Therefore, with only few exceptions, it is almost exclusively applied in hospitalized patients (short-term therapy) or to bridge 2 phases of treatment with oral anticoagulant drugs. Today, besides the conventional high-molecular weight heparins, new fractionated heparins are gaining more and more attention. They offer the advantage of a more reliable resorption from the subcutaneous tissue and thus warrant reliable plasma levels. In many recent randomized trials of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, those fractionated heparins have proven to successfully substitute for intravenously applied, aPTT-controlled unfractionated heparin. It remains however open, whether this also translates into the prevention of arterial thrombo-embolic diseases. Heparin may not pass through the placental barrier nor into the milk and is regarded non-teratogenic. Therefore, it may be regarded the ideal anticoagulant for pregnant women and lactating mothers. Those women, however, still carry the heparin-associated risk of bleeding and osteoporosis. In comparison: Coumadin derivatives interfere with the carboxylation of the clotting factors II, VII, IX, and X as well as proteins C and S. By inhibiting the synthesis of these proteins they shift the haemostatic balance to a lower level. In addition, they are almost completely bioavailable by the enteral pathway. They are, therefore, regarded the drugs of choice for long-term anticoagulant therapy in patients at particular thromboembolic risk. For their therapeutic range, being extremely narrow, meticulous drug monitoring by repeated INR-measurements as well as a reliable compliance of the patient to drug intake and dietary restrictions are mandatory to exclude phases with over- or under-anticoagulation. Above all, coumadin therapy is characterized by numerous drug interactions. Thus, whenever the basal medication is changed, for whatever reason, more intense care must be laid to drug monitoring, and the intervals for INR determinations must transiently be shortened. Coumadin derivatives do pass through the placental barrier and in minor amounts also into the milk of breast feeding mothers. Furthermore, they are highly teratogenic. If taken during pregnancy, malformations of the central nervous system are reported to occur in some 10% to 30% of the infants. Thus during pregnancy and in the lactation period, coumadin therapy should be avoided. Bleeding episodes of different severity are the most frequent adverse effects of anticoagulant therapy, no matter whether heparin or coumadin is given. There is a direct relation between the intensity of anticoagulant therapy and the frequency of bleeds. Luckily, most bleeding episodes do not create major therapeutic problems. In case of severe bleeds, however, the anticoagulant therapy must immediately be suspended. In case of coumadin therapy the immediate administration of 4 packs of PPSB (prothrombin-complex-concentrates) or FFP (fresh-frozen-plasma) with concomitant low doses of heparin is additionally advised. Allopecia diffusa, urticartia and allergic reactions are known side effects of anticoagulant therapy. Patients on long-term heparin may also suffer from severe osteoporosis. On the other hand, heparin treatment raises the hazzards of a HAT-Syndrome (heparin-associated thrombocytopenia) (estimated frequency 0.01% to 0.1% of treated patients), giving rise to severe and life-threatening thrombo-embolic side effects predominantly in the arterial tree. In these cases, heparin must be suspended despite those severe thrombo-embolic episodes.
在当今医学中,肝素和香豆素衍生物等抗凝血药物已成为治疗血栓栓塞性疾病不可或缺的药物。肝素由长度和序列可变的长链多硫酸化多糖组成,主要来源于猪黏膜。其通过非胃肠外给药途径的生物利用度几乎可以忽略不计。因此,除了少数例外情况,它几乎仅用于住院患者(短期治疗)或用于衔接口服抗凝血药物治疗的两个阶段。如今,除了传统的高分子量肝素外,新型低分子肝素越来越受到关注。它们具有从皮下组织吸收更可靠的优点,因此能保证可靠的血浆水平。在最近许多关于深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞的随机试验中,这些低分子肝素已被证明能够成功替代静脉注射的、活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)控制的普通肝素。然而,这是否也能转化为预防动脉血栓栓塞性疾病仍未明确。肝素不能穿过胎盘屏障,也不会进入乳汁,被认为无致畸性。因此,它可被视为孕妇和哺乳期母亲的理想抗凝血剂。然而,这些女性仍存在与肝素相关的出血和骨质疏松风险。相比之下:香豆素衍生物会干扰凝血因子II、VII、IX和X以及蛋白C和S的羧化作用。通过抑制这些蛋白质的合成,它们将止血平衡转移到较低水平。此外,它们通过肠道途径几乎完全具有生物利用度。因此,它们被视为具有特定血栓栓塞风险患者长期抗凝血治疗的首选药物。由于其治疗范围极窄,必须通过重复测量国际标准化比值(INR)进行细致的药物监测,以及患者对药物摄入和饮食限制的可靠依从性,以排除抗凝过度或不足的阶段。最重要的是,香豆素治疗具有众多药物相互作用。因此,无论出于何种原因,只要基础用药发生变化,就必须更加密切地进行药物监测,并且必须暂时缩短INR测定的间隔时间。香豆素衍生物确实会穿过胎盘屏障,也会少量进入母乳喂养母亲的乳汁。此外,它们具有高度致畸性。据报道,如果在怀孕期间服用,约10%至30%的婴儿会出现中枢神经系统畸形。因此,在怀孕期间和哺乳期应避免使用香豆素治疗。无论使用肝素还是香豆素,不同严重程度的出血事件都是抗凝血治疗最常见的不良反应。抗凝血治疗的强度与出血频率之间存在直接关系。幸运的是,大多数出血事件不会造成重大治疗问题。然而,在严重出血的情况下,必须立即暂停抗凝血治疗。在香豆素治疗的情况下,还建议立即给予4单位的凝血酶原复合物浓缩物(PPSB)或新鲜冰冻血浆(FFP),并同时给予低剂量肝素。弥漫性脱发、荨麻疹和过敏反应是已知的抗凝血治疗副作用。长期使用肝素的患者也可能患有严重的骨质疏松症。另一方面,肝素治疗会增加肝素相关血小板减少症(HAT综合征)的风险(估计发生率为治疗患者的0.01%至0.1%),主要在动脉系统中引发严重且危及生命的血栓栓塞性副作用。在这些情况下,尽管会出现严重的血栓栓塞事件,也必须停用肝素。