Visalli M A, Jacobs M R, Appelbaum P C
Department of Pathology, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 Jan;37(1):77-84. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.1.77.
Activity of CP 99,219 (trovafloxacin), clinafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin, lomefloxacin and cefuroxime against 4 penicillin-susceptible, 2 penicillin-intermediate and 4 penicillin-resistant pneumococci was tested by MIC and time-kill methodology. Bacteriostatic values for all three groups did not differ significantly with all compounds tested except cefuroxime, and were lowest for trovafloxacin and clinafloxacin, followed by sparfloxacin, ciprofloxacin and lomefloxacin; cefuroxime yielded values which increased in line with those of penicillin G. The test compounds were bactericidal (i.e. they reduced original counts by > or = 3 log10 cfu/mL at one dilution above bacteriostatic levels) in most cases, though some strains showed slightly greater discrepancies between bacteriostatic and bactericidal levels of all compounds tested. Trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin and sparfloxacin yielded MIC and time-kill results which point to possible efficacy in treatment of penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococcal infections.
采用最低抑菌浓度(MIC)和时间杀菌法,对CP 99,219(曲伐沙星)、克林沙星、环丙沙星、司帕沙星、洛美沙星和头孢呋辛针对4株青霉素敏感、2株青霉素中介和4株青霉素耐药肺炎球菌的活性进行了测试。除头孢呋辛外,所有测试化合物对所有三组的抑菌值差异均无统计学意义,曲伐沙星和克林沙星的抑菌值最低,其次是司帕沙星、环丙沙星和洛美沙星;头孢呋辛产生的值随青霉素G的值增加而增加。在大多数情况下,测试化合物具有杀菌作用(即它们在高于抑菌水平一个稀释度时使原始菌数减少≥3 log10 cfu/mL),尽管一些菌株在所有测试化合物的抑菌和杀菌水平之间显示出稍大的差异。曲伐沙星、克林沙星和司帕沙星产生的MIC和时间杀菌结果表明,它们可能对青霉素敏感和耐药的肺炎球菌感染治疗有效。