de Marie S
University Hospital Rotterdam/Dijkzigt, Dept Bacteriology, The Netherlands.
Leukemia. 1996 Jun;10 Suppl 2:s93-6.
Encapsulating amphotericin B (AmB) into liposomes or binding of AmB to other lipid carriers results in a significant reduction of toxicity of AmB and possibly an increased therapeutic index. Following promising clinical results with investigational formulations, three industrial compounds have been developed: AmBisome, Amphocil (Amphotericin B Colloidal Dispersion) and Amphotericin B Lipid Complex (ABLC, Abelcet). These three formulations differ significantly in composition and pharmacokinetics. AmB serum levels after ABLC and Amphocil administration are low, but after AmBisome much higher. However, the interpretation of the pharmacokinetic data is hampered by the inability to separate free AmB fractions from tissue-, protein- and lipid carrier bound fractions. All three compounds share a considerable reduction of nephrotoxicity. However, the acute reaction rates differ among these compounds. Amphocil showing the highest and AmBisome the lowest rate. Unfortunately, efficacy data of ongoing trials comparing these formulations with conventional AmB are scarce. Therefore, for the moment we can recommend these compounds only in cases of intolerance to or failure on AmB therapy. The optimal therapeutic dosages have not been established, but dosages as low as 1 mg/kg should be avoided in the initial treatment of fulminant fungal infections, since efficacy may be inferior to equal doses of conventional AmB.
将两性霉素B(AmB)包裹于脂质体中或使其与其他脂质载体结合,可显著降低AmB的毒性,并可能提高治疗指数。在研究性制剂取得了令人鼓舞的临床结果后,已开发出三种上市产品:安必素(AmBisome)、两性霉素B胶体分散体(Amphocil)和两性霉素B脂质复合物(ABLC,Abelcet)。这三种制剂在组成和药代动力学方面有显著差异。给予ABLC和Amphocil后,AmB的血清水平较低,但给予安必素后则高得多。然而,由于无法将游离AmB组分与组织、蛋白质和脂质载体结合的组分分离,药代动力学数据的解读受到了阻碍。这三种化合物均显著降低了肾毒性。然而,这些化合物的急性反应率有所不同。Amphocil的反应率最高,安必素的反应率最低。遗憾的是,目前比较这些制剂与传统AmB的正在进行的试验的疗效数据很少。因此,目前我们仅在对AmB治疗不耐受或治疗失败的情况下推荐使用这些化合物。尚未确定最佳治疗剂量,但在暴发性真菌感染的初始治疗中应避免低至1mg/kg的剂量,因为其疗效可能不如同等剂量的传统AmB。