• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Information sources used in decision making: considerations for simulation development.

作者信息

Lamond D, Crow R, Chase J, Doggen K, Swinkels M

机构信息

European Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, UK.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud. 1996 Feb;33(1):47-57. doi: 10.1016/0020-7489(95)00064-x.

DOI:10.1016/0020-7489(95)00064-x
PMID:8655264
Abstract

Simulation tasks, together with think aloud techniques are often used to research the cognitive processes individuals go through when making a decision or solving a problem. They have been utilised to a certain degree within nursing. A study was carried out to try and identify the sources of information nurses in acute medical and surgical wards used to make assessment judgements. A sample of 114 nurses were interviewed, and their responses analysed using content analysis. Four main sources of information were identified, with verbal interaction being the source of information most frequently mentioned by the subjects. The content of material presented in simulations is normally tested using techniques such as expert panels. However, this paper suggests that of equal importance may be the form of presentation or source of that information. It is suggested that in order to increase the validity of information obtained from simulation tasks, the form of presentation of information to the subject should also be considered.

摘要

相似文献

1
Information sources used in decision making: considerations for simulation development.
Int J Nurs Stud. 1996 Feb;33(1):47-57. doi: 10.1016/0020-7489(95)00064-x.
2
How do children's nurses make clinical decisions? Two preliminary studies.儿童护士如何做出临床决策?两项初步研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Oct;15(10):1324-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01453.x.
3
Nurses' reasoning process during care planning taking pressure ulcer prevention as an example. A think-aloud study.以预防压疮为例探讨护士在护理计划制定过程中的推理过程。一项有声思维研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Sep;44(7):1109-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.04.016. Epub 2006 Jun 27.
4
Judgements and processes in care decisions in acute medical and surgical wards.急性内科和外科病房护理决策中的判断与流程。
J Eval Clin Pract. 1996 Aug;2(3):211-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.1996.tb00047.x.
5
Clinical reasoning in nursing, a think-aloud study using virtual patients - a base for an innovative assessment.护理中的临床推理:一项使用虚拟患者的有声思维研究——创新评估的基础
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Apr;34(4):538-42. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.07.010. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
6
A comparison of novice and expert nurses' cue collection during clinical decision-making: verbal protocol analysis.新手护士与专家护士在临床决策过程中线索收集的比较:口头报告分析
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Oct;46(10):1335-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.04.001. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
7
Deepening the quality of clinical reasoning and decision-making in rural hospital nursing practice.深化农村医院护理实践中临床推理与决策的质量。
Rural Remote Health. 2014;14(3):2858. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
8
Research information in nurses' clinical decision-making: what is useful?护士临床决策中的研究信息:哪些是有用的?
J Adv Nurs. 2001 Nov;36(3):376-88. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01985.x.
9
Comparison of 'think aloud' and observation as data collection methods in the study of decision making regarding sedation in intensive care patients.在重症监护患者镇静决策研究中,“出声思考”和观察作为数据收集方法的比较。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Mar;48(3):318-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.07.014. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
10
Registered nurses' clinical reasoning in home healthcare clinical practice: A think-aloud study with protocol analysis.注册护士在家庭医疗临床实践中的临床推理:一项采用协议分析的有声思维研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 May;40:95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.02.023. Epub 2016 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the PROFHER trial findings on surgeons' clinical practice: An online questionnaire survey.PROFHER试验结果对外科医生临床实践的影响:一项在线问卷调查
Bone Joint Res. 2017 Oct;6(10):590-599. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.610.BJR-2017-0170.
2
Capturing judgement strategies in risk assessments with improved quality of clinical information: How nurses' strategies differ from the ecological model.通过提高临床信息质量来捕捉风险评估中的判断策略:护士的策略与生态模型的差异
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jan 23;16:7. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0243-1.
3
The effect of improving task representativeness on capturing nurses' risk assessment judgements: a comparison of written case simulations and physical simulations.
改善任务代表性对捕捉护士风险评估判断的影响:书面案例模拟与物理模拟的比较。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 May 30;13:62. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-62.