• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定负责任研究的伦理标准:为何?形式?功能?过程?结果?

Developing ethical standards for responsible research: Why? Form? Functions? Process? Outcomes?

作者信息

Frankel M S

机构信息

Program on Scientific Freedom, Responsibility and Law, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC 20005, USA.

出版信息

J Dent Res. 1996 Feb;75(2):832-5. doi: 10.1177/00220345960750021601.

DOI:10.1177/00220345960750021601
PMID:8655783
Abstract

Any profession that is considering the development of ethical standards should give serious attention to the intended purposes of such standards, what form they should take, what functions they will serve, how the process for developing them should be organized, what outcomes are sought, and what values are central to the mission and performance of the profession. The profession serves as a normative reference group for individual practitioners and through ethical standards clarifies, for both its members and outsiders, the norms that ought to govern professional behavior. Such standards may be aspirational, educational, or regulatory, and may perform many functions, nine of which are discussed. The process of developing standards is assessed because of the role it plays in gaining consensus on professional values and ethical norms. Finally, several outcomes likely to increase the value and utility of ethical standards are identified.

摘要

任何正在考虑制定道德标准的职业都应认真关注此类标准的预期目的、应采取的形式、将发挥的功能、制定标准的过程应如何组织、寻求何种结果以及哪些价值观对于该职业的使命和表现至关重要。该职业为个体从业者充当规范参照群体,并通过道德标准向其成员和外部人员阐明应规范职业行为的准则。此类标准可能是理想性的、教育性的或规范性的,并且可能发挥多种功能,本文将讨论其中九种。由于制定标准的过程在就职业价值观和道德规范达成共识方面所起的作用,因此对其进行了评估。最后,确定了几种可能会提高道德标准的价值和效用的结果。

相似文献

1
Developing ethical standards for responsible research: Why? Form? Functions? Process? Outcomes?制定负责任研究的伦理标准:为何?形式?功能?过程?结果?
J Dent Res. 1996 Feb;75(2):832-5. doi: 10.1177/00220345960750021601.
2
The moral foundations of scientific ethics and responsibility.科学伦理与责任的道德基础。
J Dent Res. 1996 Feb;75(2):825-31. doi: 10.1177/00220345960750021501.
3
Militarism, human welfare, and the APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists.军国主义、人类福祉与美国心理学会心理学家伦理原则
Ethics Behav. 1992;2(4):287-310. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0204_5.
4
Role of professional organizations in setting and enforcing ethical norms.专业组织在制定和执行道德规范方面的作用。
Clin Dermatol. 2012 Mar-Apr;30(2):156-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2011.06.002.
5
Professional values and norms for nurses in Belgium.比利时护士的职业价值观与规范
Nurs Ethics. 2003 Nov;10(6):654-65. doi: 10.1191/0969733003ne654oa.
6
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
7
Ethics and research in nursing.
Nurs Ethics. 1994 Dec;1(4):216-23. doi: 10.1177/096973309400100405.
8
American Dental Association Principles of Ethics and Code of Professional Conduct. With official advisory opinions revised to July 1988. Council on Ethics, Bylaws, and Judicial Affairs.美国牙科协会伦理原则与职业行为准则。官方咨询意见修订至1988年7月。伦理、章程及司法事务委员会。
J Am Dent Assoc. 1988 Oct;117(5):657-61.
9
Ethical codes: between theory and health care practice.
Med Law. 2003;22(2):251-8.
10
Prolegomena to any future code of ethics for bioethics.生物伦理学未来任何伦理准则的绪论。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1993 Fall;2(4):402-15.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholder views of ethical guidance regarding prevention and care in HIV vaccine trials.利益相关者对HIV疫苗试验中预防与护理伦理指导的看法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Jun 30;15:51. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-51.
2
Authorship and publication practices in the social sciences: historical reflections on current practices.社会科学中的作者身份和出版实践:对当前实践的历史反思。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Jun;17(2):365-88. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9280-4. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
3
Developing a code of ethics for academics. Commentary on 'Ethics for all: differences across scientific society codes' (Bullock and Panicker).
制定学术道德规范。对《全民道德规范:各科学学会规范的差异》(布洛克和帕尼克)的评论
Sci Eng Ethics. 2003 Apr;9(2):171-9. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0004-2.
4
Ambiguity, trust, and the responsible conduct of research.模糊性、信任与负责任的研究行为。
Sci Eng Ethics. 1999 Apr;5(2):205-14. doi: 10.1007/s11948-999-0011-z.