• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

红霉素治疗急性支气管炎的有效性。

Effectiveness of erythromycin in the treatment of acute bronchitis.

作者信息

King D E, Williams W C, Bishop L, Shechter A

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, East Carolina University School of Medicine, Greenville, NC 27858-4354, USA.

出版信息

J Fam Pract. 1996 Jun;42(6):601-5.

PMID:8656171
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials have not shown a consistent benefit of treating bronchitis with antibiotics. Many physicians, however, treat acute bronchitis with antibiotics because of the possibility of Mycoplasma pneumoniae or other pathogens. The objectives of this study were to determine the effectiveness of erythromycin treatment in patients with acute bronchitis and to determine whether a newly developed rapid M pneumoniae antibody test is useful in predicting which patients will respond to therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial at three primary care centers in North Carolina. A convenience sample of 140 patients presenting with acute bronchitis were tested for M pneumoniae, 91 of whom were treated with either erythromycin 250 mg four times daily for 10 days or an identical-appearing placebo.

RESULTS

Patients treated with erythromycin missed an average of only 0.81 +/- 1.1 days of work compared with 2.16 +/- 3.2 days for placebo-treated patients (P < .02). There were no significant differences in cough, use of cough medicine, general feeling of well-being, or chest congestion between the erythromycin and placebo groups. Twenty-five percent of the patients tested positive for M pneumoniae. There were no differences in response to erythromycin based on whether the patient had a positive test for M pneumoniae.

CONCLUSIONS

Erythromycin is effective in significantly reducing lost time from work, but it is not effective in reducing cough or other symptoms in patients with acute bronchitis, regardless of the outcome of the M pneumoniae antibody test.

摘要

背景

临床试验尚未显示使用抗生素治疗支气管炎有一致的益处。然而,许多医生因肺炎支原体或其他病原体感染的可能性而使用抗生素治疗急性支气管炎。本研究的目的是确定红霉素治疗急性支气管炎患者的有效性,并确定新开发的快速肺炎支原体抗体检测是否有助于预测哪些患者对治疗有反应。

方法

我们在北卡罗来纳州的三个初级保健中心进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的临床试验。对140例急性支气管炎患者的便利样本进行了肺炎支原体检测,其中91例患者接受了每日4次、每次250mg红霉素治疗10天,或外观相同的安慰剂治疗。

结果

与接受安慰剂治疗的患者平均缺勤2.16±3.2天相比,接受红霉素治疗的患者平均仅缺勤0.81±1.1天(P<.02)。红霉素组和安慰剂组在咳嗽、止咳药使用、总体幸福感或胸部充血方面无显著差异。25%的患者肺炎支原体检测呈阳性。无论患者肺炎支原体检测结果是否为阳性,对红霉素的反应均无差异。

结论

红霉素可有效显著减少工作时间损失,但对减轻急性支气管炎患者的咳嗽或其他症状无效,无论肺炎支原体抗体检测结果如何。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of erythromycin in the treatment of acute bronchitis.红霉素治疗急性支气管炎的有效性。
J Fam Pract. 1996 Jun;42(6):601-5.
2
Antibiotics: neither cost effective nor 'cough' effective.抗生素:既不具有成本效益,对“咳嗽”也无效。
J Fam Pract. 1997 Mar;44(3):261-5.
3
A comparison of albuterol and erythromycin for the treatment of acute bronchitis.
J Fam Pract. 1991 Nov;33(5):476-80.
4
Albuterol delivered by metered-dose inhaler to treat acute bronchitis.
J Fam Pract. 1994 Nov;39(5):437-40.
5
A placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of erythromycin in adults with acute bronchitis.
J Fam Pract. 1987 Aug;25(2):137-41.
6
Treatment of acute bronchitis in adults with a pelargonium sidoides preparation (EPs 7630): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.用香叶天竺葵制剂(EPs 7630)治疗成人急性支气管炎:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Explore (NY). 2005 Nov;1(6):437-45. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2005.08.009.
7
Erythromycin for treatment of acute bronchitis.红霉素用于治疗急性支气管炎。
J Fam Pract. 1996 Sep;43(3):230-1.
8
Are antibiotics effective treatment for acute bronchitis? A meta-analysis.抗生素对急性支气管炎有效吗?一项荟萃分析。
J Fam Pract. 1998 Dec;47(6):453-60.
9
Effectiveness of short-course therapy (5 days) with grepafloxacin in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.格帕沙星短程疗法(5天)治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的疗效
Clin Ther. 1999 Jan;21(1):172-88. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)88277-6.
10
Erythromycin in the treatment of acute bronchitis in a community practice.红霉素在社区医疗中治疗急性支气管炎的应用
J Fam Pract. 1986 Aug;23(2):119-22.

引用本文的文献

1
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Med Mal Infect. 1999 Apr;29(4):237-257. doi: 10.1016/S0399-077X(99)80032-8. Epub 2002 Apr 8.
2
Antibiotics for lower respiratory tract infection in children presenting in primary care: ARTIC-PC RCT.儿童下呼吸道感染在基层医疗就诊时使用抗生素:ARTIC-PC RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Jun;27(9):1-90. doi: 10.3310/DGBV3199.
3
Antibiotic effectiveness for children with lower respiratory infections: prospective cohort and trial in primary care.抗生素治疗下呼吸道感染儿童的效果:基层医疗中的前瞻性队列研究和试验。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Feb 23;73(728):e156-e163. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0239. Print 2023 Mar.
4
Adverse events in people taking macrolide antibiotics versus placebo for any indication.服用大环内酯类抗生素与服用安慰剂的人群因任何适应症出现的不良事件。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 18;1(1):CD011825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011825.pub2.
5
Antibiotics for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重期的抗生素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 29;10(10):CD010257. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010257.pub2.
6
Antibiotics for acute bronchitis.用于急性支气管炎的抗生素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 19;6(6):CD000245. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000245.pub4.
7
How long does a cough last? Comparing patients' expectations with data from a systematic review of the literature.咳嗽持续多久?将患者的期望与系统综述文献中的数据进行比较。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Jan-Feb;11(1):5-13. doi: 10.1370/afm.1430.
8
Rapid mycoplasma culture for the early diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection.快速支原体培养用于早期诊断肺炎支原体感染。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2010;24(4):224-9. doi: 10.1002/jcla.20390.
9
Use of antibiotics by primary care doctors in Hong Kong.香港基层医疗医生对抗生素的使用情况。
Asia Pac Fam Med. 2009 May 22;8(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1447-056X-8-5.
10
Chronic cough due to acute bronchitis: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.急性支气管炎所致慢性咳嗽:美国胸科医师学会循证临床实践指南
Chest. 2006 Jan;129(1 Suppl):95S-103S. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.95S.