Smith Susan M, Fahey Tom, Smucny John, Becker Lorne A
HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, RCSI Medical School, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 19;6(6):CD000245. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000245.pub4.
The benefits and risks of antibiotics for acute bronchitis remain unclear despite it being one of the most common illnesses seen in primary care.
To assess the effects of antibiotics in improving outcomes and to assess adverse effects of antibiotic therapy for people with a clinical diagnosis of acute bronchitis.
We searched CENTRAL 2016, Issue 11 (accessed 13 January 2017), MEDLINE (1966 to January week 1, 2017), Embase (1974 to 13 January 2017), and LILACS (1982 to 13 January 2017). We searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov on 5 April 2017.
Randomised controlled trials comparing any antibiotic therapy with placebo or no treatment in acute bronchitis or acute productive cough, in people without underlying pulmonary disease.
At least two review authors extracted data and assessed trial quality.
We did not identify any new trials for inclusion in this 2017 update. We included 17 trials with 5099 participants in the primary analysis. The quality of trials was generally good. At follow-up there was no difference in participants described as being clinically improved between the antibiotic and placebo groups (11 studies with 3841 participants, risk ratio (RR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99 to 1.15). Participants given antibiotics were less likely to have a cough (4 studies with 275 participants, RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.85; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 6) and a night cough (4 studies with 538 participants, RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.83; NNTB 7). Participants given antibiotics had a shorter mean cough duration (7 studies with 2776 participants, mean difference (MD) -0.46 days, 95% CI -0.87 to -0.04). The differences in presence of a productive cough at follow-up and MD of productive cough did not reach statistical significance.Antibiotic-treated participants were more likely to be improved according to clinician's global assessment (6 studies with 891 participants, RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.79; NNTB 11) and were less likely to have an abnormal lung exam (5 studies with 613 participants, RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.70; NNTB 6). Antibiotic-treated participants also had a reduction in days feeling ill (5 studies with 809 participants, MD -0.64 days, 95% CI -1.16 to -0.13) and days with impaired activity (6 studies with 767 participants, MD -0.49 days, 95% CI -0.94 to -0.04). The differences in proportions with activity limitations at follow-up did not reach statistical significance. There was a significant trend towards an increase in adverse effects in the antibiotic group (12 studies with 3496 participants, RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.36; NNT for an additional harmful outcome 24).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence of clinical benefit to support the use of antibiotics in acute bronchitis. Antibiotics may have a modest beneficial effect in some patients such as frail, elderly people with multimorbidity who may not have been included in trials to date. However, the magnitude of this benefit needs to be considered in the broader context of potential side effects, medicalisation for a self limiting condition, increased resistance to respiratory pathogens, and cost of antibiotic treatment.
尽管急性支气管炎是基层医疗中最常见的疾病之一,但抗生素治疗急性支气管炎的利弊仍不明确。
评估抗生素对改善急性支气管炎患者预后的效果,并评估抗生素治疗的不良反应。
我们检索了Cochrane系统评价数据库2016年第11期(检索日期为2017年1月13日)、MEDLINE数据库(1966年至2017年1月第1周)、Embase数据库(1974年至2017年1月13日)和LILACS数据库(1982年至2017年1月13日)。我们于2017年4月5日检索了世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(WHO ICTRP)和ClinicalTrials.gov。
比较任何抗生素治疗与安慰剂或不治疗对无基础肺部疾病的急性支气管炎或急性咳痰性咳嗽患者疗效的随机对照试验。
至少两名综述作者提取数据并评估试验质量。
在本次2017年更新中,我们未纳入任何新的试验。在主要分析中,我们纳入了17项试验,共5099名参与者。试验质量总体良好。随访时,抗生素组和安慰剂组中临床症状改善的参与者比例无差异(11项研究,共3841名参与者,风险比(RR)为1.07,95%置信区间(CI)为0.99至1.15)。接受抗生素治疗的参与者咳嗽的可能性较小(4项研究,共275名参与者,RR为0.64,95%CI为0.49至0.85;为获得额外有益结果所需治疗人数(NNTB)为6),夜间咳嗽的可能性也较小(4项研究,共538名参与者,RR为0.67,95%CI为0.54至0.83;NNTB为7)。接受抗生素治疗的参与者平均咳嗽持续时间较短(7项研究,共2776名参与者,平均差(MD)为-0.46天,95%CI为-0.87至-0.04)。随访时咳痰性咳嗽的发生率及咳痰性咳嗽的MD差异无统计学意义。根据临床医生的整体评估,接受抗生素治疗的参与者改善的可能性更大(6项研究,共891名参与者,RR为0.61,95%CI为0.48至0.79;NNTB为11),肺部检查异常的可能性较小(5项研究,共613名参与者,RR为0.54,95%CI为0.41至0.70;NNTB为6)。接受抗生素治疗的参与者感觉不适的天数也减少了(5项研究,共809名参与者,MD为-0.64天,95%CI为-1.16至-0.13),活动受限的天数也减少了(6项研究,共767名参与者,MD为-0.49天,95%CI为-0.94至-0.04)。随访时活动受限比例的差异无统计学意义。抗生素组不良反应增加有显著趋势(12项研究,共3496名参与者,RR为1.20,95%CI为1.05至1.36;为获得额外有害结果所需治疗人数为24)。
支持在急性支气管炎中使用抗生素的临床获益证据有限。抗生素可能对某些患者有适度的有益作用,如体弱、患有多种疾病的老年人,这些患者可能未被纳入迄今为止的试验。然而,在考虑潜在副作用、对自限性疾病的医学化处理、对呼吸道病原体耐药性增加以及抗生素治疗成本等更广泛背景下,需要权衡这种益处的大小。