Joel S P, Ellis P, O'Byrne K, Papamichael D, Hall M, Penson R, Nicholls S, O'Donnell C, Constantinou A, Woodhull J, Nicholson M, Smith I, Talbot D, Slevin M
Department of Medical Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London.
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Jun;14(6):1903-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.6.1903.
To investigate the feasibility of therapeutic monitoring of etoposide at different plasma concentrations of the drug, and the resulting pharmacodynamic effects of such an approach.
Forty-nine previously untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients received single-agent etoposide every 3 weeks by continuous infusion over 5 days. Plasma etoposide concentrations were monitored 18 and 66 hours into the infusion to permit dose modification. The first cohort of 15 patients began treatment with etoposide 2 micrograms/mL, with dose escalation to 3 micrograms/mL for cycles 3 and 4 and 4 micrograms/mL for cycles 5 and 6, toxicity permitting. The second cohort of 34 patients commenced at 3 micrograms/mL, with dose escalation to 4 and 5 micrograms/mL on cycles 3 and 5, respectively.
Mean plasma etoposide concentration during the first treatment cycle was 93.4% +/- 26.6% of the target level at 18 hours (57% of patients within +/- 20% of the target) and 98.9% +/- 14.5% of the target level at 66 hours (82% of patients within +/- 20%). Hematologic toxicity was more pronounced in those treated with 3 micrograms/mL versus 2 micrograms/mL (median nadir neutrophil count, 1.3 v 2.6 x 10(9)/L, P = .032). Tumor responses, typically documented by the third cycle, were similar in each cohort (71% in patients commenced at 2 micrograms/mL and 70% at 3 micrograms/mL). Treatment cohort was not independently predictive of survival.
Therapeutic monitoring of infusional etoposide is feasible and dramatically reduces interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. Although this was a small nonrandomized trial, the observation of different hematologic toxicity at the two starting concentrations but similar antitumor activity further suggests that these effects may be associated with different plasma etoposide concentrations.
研究在不同血浆药物浓度下依托泊苷治疗监测的可行性,以及这种方法所产生的药效学效应。
49例既往未接受过治疗的小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者,每3周接受一次依托泊苷单药治疗,持续静脉输注5天。在输注18小时和66小时时监测血浆依托泊苷浓度,以便进行剂量调整。第一组15例患者开始接受2微克/毫升的依托泊苷治疗,在毒性允许的情况下,第3和第4周期剂量增至3微克/毫升,第5和第6周期增至4微克/毫升。第二组34例患者开始接受3微克/毫升的治疗,第3和第5周期分别增至4微克/毫升和5微克/毫升。
在第一个治疗周期中,18小时时血浆依托泊苷平均浓度为目标水平的93.4%±26.6%(57%的患者在目标值的±20%范围内),66小时时为目标水平的98.9%±14.5%(82%的患者在±20%范围内)。与接受2微克/毫升治疗的患者相比,接受3微克/毫升治疗的患者血液学毒性更明显(中性粒细胞计数最低点中位数,1.3对2.6×10⁹/L,P = 0.032)。每个队列中肿瘤反应通常在第3周期记录,相似(开始接受2微克/毫升治疗的患者中为71%,开始接受3微克/毫升治疗的患者中为70%)。治疗队列不是生存的独立预测因素。
依托泊苷静脉输注的治疗监测是可行的,并显著降低了患者间的药代动力学变异性。尽管这是一项小型非随机试验,但在两个起始浓度下观察到不同的血液学毒性但抗肿瘤活性相似,进一步表明这些效应可能与不同的血浆依托泊苷浓度有关。