• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁在说谎?

Who lies?

作者信息

Kashy D A, DePaulo B M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-4235, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 May;70(5):1037-51.

PMID:8656334
Abstract

Seventy-seven undergraduates and 70 demographically diverse members of the community completed 12 individual differences measures hypothesized to predict lie-telling in everyday life and then kept a diary every day for a week of all of their social interactions and all of the lies that they told during those interactions. Consistent with predictions, the people who told more lies were more manipulative, more concerned with self-presentation, and more sociable. People who told fewer lies were more highly socialized and reported higher quality same-sex relationships. Manipulative people, less highly socialized people, and people with less gratifying same-sex relationships also told especially more self-serving lies, whereas people with higher quality same-sex relationships told relatively more other oriented lies.

摘要

77名本科生和70名来自不同社会阶层的社区成员完成了12项个体差异测量,这些测量旨在预测日常生活中的说谎行为,随后他们连续一周每天记录自己所有的社交互动以及在这些互动中所说的谎言。与预测相符,说谎较多的人更具操控性、更关注自我表现且更善于社交。说谎较少的人社交能力更强,且报告称同性关系质量更高。具有操控性的人、社交能力较弱的人以及同性关系满意度较低的人也会说更多的利己谎言,而同性关系质量较高的人则相对会说更多的利他谎言。

相似文献

1
Who lies?谁在说谎?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 May;70(5):1037-51.
2
Lying in everyday life.日常生活中的谎言。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 May;70(5):979-95.
3
Everyday lies in close and casual relationships.日常存在于亲密且随意的关系之中。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jan;74(1):63-79. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.1.63.
4
Detecting lies in children and adults.检测儿童和成人是否说谎。
Law Hum Behav. 2006 Feb;30(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9031-2.
5
[Validation study of the Depressive Experience Questionnaire].《抑郁体验问卷的效度研究》
Encephale. 2003 Sep-Oct;29(5):445-55.
6
Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.判断欺骗行为中的个体差异:准确性与偏差。
Psychol Bull. 2008 Jul;134(4):477-92. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.477.
7
Adults' ability to detect children's lying.成年人察觉儿童说谎的能力。
Behav Sci Law. 2006;24(5):703-15. doi: 10.1002/bsl.731.
8
Interpersonal hierarchy expectation: introduction of a new construct.人际等级期望:一种新结构的引入
J Pers Assess. 2005 Jun;84(3):287-95. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_08.
9
The motor cost of telling lies: electrocortical signatures and personality foundations of spontaneous deception.说谎的心理成本:自发欺骗的脑电特征与人格基础
Soc Neurosci. 2014;9(6):573-89. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.934394. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
10
To lie or not to lie: to whom and under what circumstances.说谎还是不说谎:对谁以及在何种情况下说谎。
Child Dev. 2007 Mar-Apr;78(2):609-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01017.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining embedded lies through computational text analysis.通过计算文本分析来审视内在的谎言。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 21;15(1):26482. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11327-w.
2
Information distortion in word-of-mouth retransmission: the effects of retransmitter intention and source expertise.口碑再传播中的信息失真:再传播者意图与信息源专业性的影响
Asian Bus Manag. 2023 Apr 15:1-29. doi: 10.1057/s41291-023-00221-w.
3
Exploring lie frequency and emotional experiences of deceptive decision-making in autistic adults.探索自闭症成年人欺骗性决策中的说谎频率和情感体验。
Autism. 2025 Jun;29(6):1612-1626. doi: 10.1177/13623613251315892. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
4
Lying about money and game points by men and women and its relation to the Self-Reported Lying Scale.男性和女性在金钱及游戏点数方面的说谎行为及其与自我报告说谎量表的关系。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 17;14:1304237. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1304237. eCollection 2023.
5
Psychometric properties of the CEMA-A questionnaire: motives for lying.CEMA-A问卷的心理测量特性:说谎动机
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 20;14:1289209. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1289209. eCollection 2023.
6
A Latent Profile Analysis of Lie-Telling to Parents and Friends during Adolescence.青少年期向父母和朋友说谎的潜在剖面分析
J Youth Adolesc. 2023 Dec;52(12):2559-2577. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01834-2. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
7
Which Dark Personality Traits Could Predict Insomnia? The Mediated Effects of Perceived Stress and Ethical Judgments.哪些黑暗人格特质能够预测失眠?感知压力和道德判断的中介作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Feb 1;13(2):122. doi: 10.3390/bs13020122.
8
Condition-dependent trade-offs maintain honest signalling.条件依赖性权衡维持诚实信号传递。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Oct 5;9(10):220335. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220335. eCollection 2022 Oct.
9
Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity.病理性说谎:对一种诊断实体的理论与实证支持
Psychiatr Res Clin Pract. 2020 Oct 16;2(2):62-69. doi: 10.1176/appi.prcp.20190046. eCollection 2020 Dec.
10
Personality Traits as Predictors of Malevolent Creative Ideation in Offenders.人格特质作为罪犯恶意创造性思维的预测指标
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Jul 21;12(7):242. doi: 10.3390/bs12070242.