Rock J A, Brame R G, Parker R T
Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Jun;49(6):721-3.
One hundred and fifteen patients admitted to Duke University Medical Center from January 1, 1973, to December 31, 1974 inclusive, with the diagnosis of uncomplicated spontaneous incomplete or inevitable abortion were included in a randomized prospective study. All patients underwent suction curettage under either analgesia or general inhalation anesthesia. Patient response was adjudged regarding comfort and cooperativeness in the group receiving analgesia and postprocedure rehabilitation and discharge times in both groups. Fifteen of 59 patients receiving analgesia only were recorded unanimously as failures. Post-operative ambulation was no more rapid in patients receiving analgesia. Procedure-to-discharge intervals were unrelated to medication modality. There appears to be no advantage to analgesia as far as rehabilitation time, procedure-to-discharge time, and medical complications are concerned.
1973年1月1日至1974年12月31日期间(含首尾两天)入住杜克大学医学中心、诊断为单纯性自然不全流产或难免流产的115例患者被纳入一项随机前瞻性研究。所有患者均在镇痛或全身吸入麻醉下接受刮宫术。对接受镇痛治疗组患者的舒适度和配合度以及两组患者术后康复和出院时间进行了评估。仅接受镇痛治疗的59例患者中有15例被一致记录为治疗失败。接受镇痛治疗的患者术后下床活动速度并未更快。从手术到出院的间隔时间与用药方式无关。就康复时间、手术到出院时间和医疗并发症而言,镇痛似乎并无优势。