Ferrannini E, Vichi S, Beck-Nielsen H, Laakso M, Paolisso G, Smith U
University of Odense, Denmark.
Diabetes. 1996 Jul;45(7):947-53. doi: 10.2337/diab.45.7.947.
Evidence that age is associated with insulin resistance is discordant. We analyzed euglycemic insulin clamp (1 mU x min(-1) x kg(-1)) data collected at 20 centers throughout Europe from 1,146 men and women with normal glucose tolerance, ranging in age from 18 to 85 years. In the whole group, insulin action (as the M value) declined slightly with age (at a rate of 0.9 micromol x min(-1)-kg(-1) per decade of life, 95% CI = 0.4-1.3, P = 0.0002). When adjusted for BMI, this relationship was no longer statistically significant. The same result was obtained whether insulin action was expressed per kilogram of body weight or per kilogram of fat-free mass, expressed as the M:I ratio, or estimated from fasting plasma insulin concentrations. Subgroup analysis showed that a significant BMI-adjusted decrease in insulin action with age was present only in lean (BMI <25 kg/m2) women (a rate of 1.6 micromol x min(-1) x kg(-1) per decade, 95% CI = 0.6-2.5, P = 0.001), in whom percentage fat mass also increased with age (by 0.38% body weight per decade, P = 0.0007). Insulin action was positively associated with insulin suppression of circulating free fatty acids (FFAs) (+1.5 micromol x min(-1) x kg(-1) for each 10% increase in FFA suppression, P < 0.0001) in a multivariate model accounting for sex, BMI, age, and fasting FFA levels. Furthermore, insulin suppression of FFAs improved with age in men (2% per decade, P < 0.0001) but not in women. In the subgroup of lean women in whom insulin action declined with age, adding FFA suppression to a multiple regression equation canceled the association between age and insulin action. Thus, the small effect of age on insulin action could be adequately explained on the basis of age-related changes in body composition and substrate competition. We conclude that in healthy Europeans, age per se is not a significant cause of insulin resistance of glucose metabolism or lipolysis.
年龄与胰岛素抵抗相关的证据并不一致。我们分析了在欧洲20个中心收集的1146名葡萄糖耐量正常的男性和女性的正常血糖胰岛素钳夹试验(1 mU·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹)数据,这些人的年龄在18至85岁之间。在整个组中,胰岛素作用(以M值表示)随年龄略有下降(每十年下降0.9 μmol·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹,95%置信区间 = 0.4 - 1.3,P = 0.0002)。调整体重指数(BMI)后,这种关系不再具有统计学意义。无论胰岛素作用是以每千克体重、每千克去脂体重表示,以M:I比值表示,还是根据空腹血浆胰岛素浓度估算,都得到相同的结果。亚组分析表明,仅在瘦(BMI <25 kg/m²)女性中,经BMI调整后胰岛素作用随年龄有显著下降(每十年下降1.6 μmol·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹,95%置信区间 = 0.6 - 2.5,P = 0.001),且这些女性的体脂百分比也随年龄增加(每十年增加0.38%体重,P = 0.0007)。在一个考虑了性别、BMI、年龄和空腹游离脂肪酸(FFA)水平的多变量模型中,胰岛素作用与胰岛素对循环游离脂肪酸(FFA)抑制作用呈正相关(FFA抑制每增加10%,增加1.5 μmol·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹,P < 0.0001)。此外,男性中胰岛素对FFA的抑制作用随年龄改善(每十年改善2%,P < 0.0001),而女性则不然。在胰岛素作用随年龄下降的瘦女性亚组中,在多元回归方程中加入FFA抑制作用后,消除了年龄与胰岛素作用之间的关联。因此,基于身体组成和底物竞争的年龄相关变化,可以充分解释年龄对胰岛素作用的微小影响。我们得出结论,在健康的欧洲人中,年龄本身并非葡萄糖代谢或脂解胰岛素抵抗的重要原因。