Lilienfeld S O, Andrews B P
Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
J Pers Assess. 1996 Jun;66(3):488-524. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6603_3.
Research on psychopathology has been hindered by persisting difficulties and controversies regarding its assessment. The primary goals of this set of studies were to (a) develop, and initiate the construct validation of, a self-report measure that assesses the major personality traits of psychopathy in noncriminal populations and (b) clarify the nature of these traits via an exploratory approach to test construction. This measure, the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI), was developed by writing items to assess a large number of personality domains relevant to psychopathy and performing successive item-level factor analyses and revisions on three undergraduate samples. The PPI total score and its eight subscales were found to possess satisfactory internal consistency and test-retest reliability. In four studies with undergraduates, the PPI and its subscales exhibited a promising pattern of convergent and discriminant validity with self-report, psychiatric interview, observer rating, and family history data. In addition, the PPI total score demonstrated incremental validity relative to several commonly used self-report psychopathy-related measures. Future construct validation studies, unresolved conceptual issues regarding the assessment of psychopathy, and potential research uses of the PPI are outlined.
心理病理学的研究一直受到其评估方面持续存在的困难和争议的阻碍。这一系列研究的主要目标是:(a)开发一种自我报告测量方法,并启动对其的构念效度验证,该方法用于评估非犯罪人群中精神病态的主要人格特质;(b)通过一种探索性的测试构建方法来阐明这些特质的本质。这种测量方法,即精神病态人格问卷(PPI),是通过编写项目来评估与精神病态相关的大量人格领域,并对三个本科样本进行连续的项目级因素分析和修订而开发出来的。研究发现,PPI总分及其八个分量表具有令人满意的内部一致性和重测信度。在四项针对本科生的研究中,PPI及其分量表在与自我报告、精神病学访谈、观察者评分和家族史数据的聚合效度和区分效度方面呈现出有前景的模式。此外,相对于几种常用的与精神病态相关的自我报告测量方法,PPI总分显示出增量效度。本文还概述了未来的构念效度研究、关于精神病态评估尚未解决的概念问题以及PPI的潜在研究用途。