Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa 35487-0348, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2012 Mar;24(1):261-7. doi: 10.1037/a0025832. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
The Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI) has shown promising construct validity as a measure of psychopathy. Because of its relative efficiency, a short-form version of the PPI (PPI-SF) was developed and has proven useful in many psychopathy studies. The validity of the PPI-SF, however, has not been thoroughly examined, and no studies have directly compared the validity of the short form with that of the full-length version. The current study was designed to compare the psychometric properties of both PPI versions, with an emphasis on convergent and discriminant validity in predicting external criteria conceptually relevant to psychopathy. We used both prison (n = 558) and college samples (n = 322) for this investigation. PPI scale scores were more reliable and more strongly correlated with the conceptually relevant criterion measures compared with the PPI-SF, particularly in the prison sample. There were no differences in relative discriminant validity. Thus, overall, the PPI full-length version showed more evidence of construct validity than did the short form, and the consequences of this psychometric difference should be considered when evaluating the clinical utility of each measure.
《精神病态人格量表》(PPI)作为一种精神病态的衡量标准,已经显示出有希望的结构有效性。由于其相对效率,开发了 PPI 的短版(PPI-SF),并已在许多精神病态研究中证明有用。然而,PPI-SF 的有效性尚未得到彻底检查,也没有研究直接比较短版和全长版的有效性。本研究旨在比较两种 PPI 版本的心理测量特性,重点是在预测与精神病态概念上相关的外部标准方面的收敛和区分效度。我们使用了监狱(n = 558)和大学样本(n = 322)进行这项研究。与 PPI-SF 相比,PPI 量表得分在监狱样本中更可靠,与概念上相关的标准测量也更相关。相对判别有效性没有差异。因此,总体而言,PPI 全长版本比短版表现出更多的结构有效性证据,在评估每个测量的临床实用性时,应该考虑这种心理测量差异的后果。