• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

曝光差异对胸部X光片临床效用的影响。

Effect of exposure variation on the clinical utility of chest radiographs.

作者信息

Slone R M, Van Metter R, Senol E, Muka E, Pilgram T K

机构信息

Electronic Radiology Laboratory, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.

出版信息

Radiology. 1996 May;199(2):497-504. doi: 10.1148/radiology.199.2.8668802.

DOI:10.1148/radiology.199.2.8668802
PMID:8668802
Abstract

PURPOSE

To study the effects of exposure error on the clinical utility of chest radiographs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Under- and overexposed screen-film images were simulated by adding exposure offsets to the normalized CR log(10) exposure data from a computed radiography (CR) system and printed by using the sensitometric response of a medium-latitude system. The clinical utility of the overall image, lung, and soft tissue in 48 images were independently graded by eight radiologists.

RESULTS

Most variability in image scores was due to differences in exposure. About 95% of the lung regions and 75% of the soft-tissue regions were rated as having good or ideal clinical utility at the nominal exposure. About 80% of the overall images were rated as good or better for exposures within 40% [0.15 log(10) exposure] of the nominal. The overall image scores were heavily influenced by the lung region, and reader tolerance for exposure error was greater for soft tissue than for lung. The optimal exposure for soft tissue was about 60% [0.25 log(10) exposure] greater than for lung; therefore, no single exposure was optimal for the entire image.

CONCLUSION

Conventional medium-latitude screen-film systems have intrinsic limitations for capturing and displaying the wide transmittance differences in the thorax. The clinical utility of chest radiographs may be improved by developing better image capture and display techniques.

摘要

目的

研究曝光误差对胸部X线片临床效用的影响。

材料与方法

通过对计算机X线摄影(CR)系统的归一化CR log(10)曝光数据添加曝光偏移量,模拟曝光不足和过度曝光的屏-片图像,并利用中纬度系统的感光响应进行打印。由八位放射科医生对48幅图像中的整体图像、肺部和软组织的临床效用进行独立评分。

结果

图像评分的最大差异源于曝光不同。在标称曝光量时,约95%的肺部区域和75%的软组织区域被评为具有良好或理想的临床效用。对于在标称曝光量40%[0.15 log(10)曝光量]范围内的曝光,约80%的整体图像被评为良好或更好。整体图像评分受肺部区域影响很大,且读者对软组织曝光误差的耐受性高于肺部。软组织的最佳曝光量比肺部约高60%[0.25 log(10)曝光量];因此,对于整个图像而言,不存在单一的最佳曝光量。

结论

传统的中纬度屏-片系统在捕捉和显示胸部广泛的透光率差异方面存在固有局限性。通过开发更好的图像采集和显示技术,可能会提高胸部X线片的临床效用。

相似文献

1
Effect of exposure variation on the clinical utility of chest radiographs.曝光差异对胸部X光片临床效用的影响。
Radiology. 1996 May;199(2):497-504. doi: 10.1148/radiology.199.2.8668802.
2
Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.减少照射剂量对计算机X线摄影的影响:胸部体模的结节检测准确性与传统及非对称屏-片X线摄影的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Aug;165(2):269-73. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.2.7618538.
3
Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.移动计算机射线摄影与移动平板射线摄影在床边胸部摄影中的对比研究:使用防散射栅对选定具有诊断意义的结构的可视性的影响。
Invest Radiol. 2014 Jan;49(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182a56654.
4
Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.基于胶片的胸部X线摄影:AMBER与非对称屏-片系统对比
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Oct;161(4):743-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.161.4.8372749.
5
Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.基于硒的胸部数字X线摄影:与屏-片X线摄影相比放射科医生的偏好
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Dec;165(6):1353-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.6.7484562.
6
Scanning equalization radiography of the chest: assessment of image quality.胸部扫描均衡X线摄影术:图像质量评估
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985 Nov;145(5):973-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.145.5.973.
7
Technical aspects of twin screen-film chest radiography: cost effective lung and mediastinal imaging.双屏胶片胸部X线摄影的技术要点:经济高效的肺部及纵隔成像
Eur J Radiol. 1998 Mar;27(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/s0720-048x(97)00033-8.
8
Optimal beam quality for chest computed radiography.胸部计算机X线摄影的最佳射束质量
Invest Radiol. 1996 Mar;31(3):126-31. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199603000-00002.
9
Chest radiography: depiction of normal anatomy and pathologic structures with selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional screen-film radiography.胸部X线摄影:基于硒的数字X线摄影与传统屏-片X线摄影对正常解剖结构和病理结构的显示
Radiology. 1997 Apr;203(1):197-201. doi: 10.1148/radiology.203.1.9122392.
10
Clinical evaluation of twin screen-film chest radiography: cost effective lung and mediastinal imaging.双屏胶片胸部X线摄影的临床评估:具有成本效益的肺部和纵隔成像
Eur J Radiol. 1998 Mar;27(1):61-6. doi: 10.1016/s0720-048x(97)00031-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Stain normalization in digital pathology: Clinical multi-center evaluation of image quality.数字病理学中的染色标准化:图像质量的临床多中心评估
J Pathol Inform. 2022 Sep 24;13:100145. doi: 10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100145. eCollection 2022.