Bloechle M, Schreiner T, Gouma E, Lisse K
Department of Reproductive Medicine and Endocrinology, University Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charite, Humboldt University, Schumannstr. 20/21, D-10098 Berlin, Germany.
Hum Reprod. 1996 Jul;11(7):1423-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019412.
Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography was compared with sonographically controlled selective tubal catheterization (STC) in 26 infertile women who complained of infertility. Both procedures were carried out on a single examination date. A group of 10 patients first underwent hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography followed by STC, while 16 first had STC followed by hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography. The main outcome measure was tubal patency. A total of 52 Fallopian tubes was assessed. Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography showed 39 tubes (75%) and STC 46 (89%) to be patent, 13 tubes (25%) and six tubes (12%) were diagnosed to be proximally occluded, by means of hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography and STC respectively. Concordant diagnosis with both methods was made in 43 of 52 tubes (83%). When hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography was followed by STC, the concordance rate was 85%. When STC was followed by hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography, the concordance rate was 81%. In one patient the diagnosis of proximal occlusion of one tube as determined by hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography and STC had to be correlated in laparoscopy. In a patient, who after hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography and STC, was suspected to have bilateral proximal occlusion of the tubes, considerable bilateral proximal stenosis and distal occlusion was documented at laparoscopy. In conclusion, sonographically controlled STC may correct a misdiagnosis in cases where hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography leads to the finding of proximal tubal obstruction. The combination of hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography and STC as an out-patient investigation method for tubal patency assessment in infertile women avoids anaesthesia and radiation. For this reason we recommend the combination of sonographically controlled STC with hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography, at least in cases where proximal tubal occlusion is suspected after hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography. The influence of the order in which the two methods are used on the results of both should be investigated in a randomized study.
对26名主诉不孕的不育女性进行了子宫输卵管造影超声检查与超声引导下选择性输卵管插管术(STC)的比较。两种检查均在同一天进行。10名患者先接受子宫输卵管造影超声检查,然后进行STC,而16名患者先进行STC,然后进行子宫输卵管造影超声检查。主要观察指标为输卵管通畅情况。共评估了52条输卵管。子宫输卵管造影超声检查显示39条输卵管(75%)通畅,STC显示46条(89%)通畅,分别通过子宫输卵管造影超声检查和STC诊断出13条输卵管(25%)和6条输卵管(12%)近端阻塞。52条输卵管中有43条(83%)两种方法诊断结果一致。当先进行子宫输卵管造影超声检查再进行STC时,一致率为85%。当先进行STC再进行子宫输卵管造影超声检查时,一致率为81%。1例患者子宫输卵管造影超声检查和STC诊断的1条输卵管近端阻塞情况需通过腹腔镜检查进行关联。1例患者在子宫输卵管造影超声检查和STC后怀疑双侧输卵管近端阻塞,腹腔镜检查记录显示存在明显的双侧近端狭窄和远端阻塞。总之,超声引导下的STC可能纠正子宫输卵管造影超声检查导致近端输卵管阻塞误诊的情况。子宫输卵管造影超声检查和STC联合作为门诊评估不育女性输卵管通畅情况的检查方法可避免麻醉和辐射。因此,我们建议将超声引导下的STC与子宫输卵管造影超声检查联合使用,至少在子宫输卵管造影超声检查后怀疑近端输卵管阻塞的情况下。两种方法使用顺序对两者结果的影响应通过随机研究进行调查。