Das A K, Pickett T M, Tungekar M F
United Medical and Dental Schools, Department of Histopathology, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1996 Jul;11(7):1256-60.
Thin glomerular basement membranes may be an important cause of microscopic haematuria. Unfortunately measurements are often not made because of the complicated methods currently employed.
A simplified method of measurement of glomerular basement membrane thickness, involving only 16 selected measurements on a single glomerulus, was compared with the accepted, but time-consuming, orthogonal intercept technique. Thirty-one needle biopsies from patients with renal haematuria unexplained by conventional histology and immunofluorescence were studied. Measurements were made on the same ultrathin sections.
The new method was found to give much lower values (mean (SD) 202+/-51 versus 282+/-52 nm) with limits of agreement of -131 to -30 nm compared with the orthogonal intercept method. The coefficient of repeatability was 39 nm for the orthogonal intercept method and 56 nm for the new method. However, using two glomeruli the new method had limits of agreement of -120 to -41 nm with a coefficient of repeatability of 38 nm.
Provided two glomeruli are measured the new technique is sufficiently accurate for the diagnosis of thin membrane nephrology, in appropriate cases, and is much simpler and cheaper than the orthogonal intercept method.
肾小球基底膜变薄可能是镜下血尿的一个重要原因。遗憾的是,由于目前所采用的方法复杂,往往未进行测量。
将一种简化的肾小球基底膜厚度测量方法(仅对单个肾小球进行16次选定测量)与公认但耗时的正交截距技术进行比较。对31例经传统组织学和免疫荧光检查无法解释的肾性血尿患者的肾穿刺活检组织进行研究。在相同的超薄切片上进行测量。
发现新方法得出的值低得多(平均值(标准差)为202±51纳米,而正交截距法为282±52纳米),与正交截距法相比,一致性界限为-131至-30纳米。正交截距法的重复性系数为39纳米,新方法为56纳米。然而,使用两个肾小球时,新方法的一致性界限为-120至-41纳米,重复性系数为38纳米。
如果测量两个肾小球,在适当情况下,新技术对于薄基底膜肾病的诊断足够准确,并且比正交截距法更简单、更便宜。