Gross P, Braun V
Universität Tübingen, Germany.
Mol Gen Genet. 1996 Jun 12;251(3):388-96. doi: 10.1007/BF02172531.
Colicin M (Cma) displays a unique activity that interferes with murein and O-antigen biosynthesis through inhibition of lipid-carrier regeneration. Immunity is conferred by a specific immunity protein (Cmi) that inhibits the action of colicin M in the periplasm. The subcellular location of Cmi was determined by constructing hybrid proteins between Cmi and the TEM-beta-lactamase (BlaM), which confers resistance to ampicillin only when it is translocated across the cytoplasmic membrane with the aid of Cmi. The smallest Cmi'-BlaM hybrid that conferred resistance to 50 micrograms/ml ampicillin contained 19 amino acid residues of Cmi; cells expressing Cmi'-BlaM with only five N-terminal Cmi residues were ampicillin sensitive. These results support a model in which the hydrophobic sequence of Cmi comprising residues 3-23 serves to translocate residues 24-117 of Cmi into the periplasm and anchors Cmi to the cytoplasmic membrane. Residues 8-23 are integrated in the cytoplasmic membrane and are not involved in Cma recognition. This model was further tested by replacing residues 1-23 of Cmi by the hydrophobic amino acid sequence 1-42 of the penicillin binding protein 3 (PBP3). In vivo, PBP3'-'Cmi was as active as Cmi, demonstrating that translocation and anchoring of Cmi is not sequence-specific. Substitution of the 23 N-terminal residues of Cmi by the cleavable signal peptide of BlaM resulted in an active BlaM'-'Cmi hybrid protein. The immunity conferred by BlaM'-'Cmi was high, but not as high as that associated with Cmi and PBP3'-'Cmi, demonstrating that soluble Cmi lacking its membrane anchor is still active, but immobilization in the cytoplasmic membrane, the target site of Cma, increases its efficiency. Cmi delta 1-23 remained in the cytoplasm and conferred no immunity. We propose that the immunity protein inactivates colicin M in the periplasm before Cma can reach its target in the cytoplasmic membrane.
大肠杆菌素M(Cma)表现出一种独特的活性,它通过抑制脂质载体的再生来干扰胞壁质和O抗原的生物合成。一种特异性免疫蛋白(Cmi)赋予了免疫性,该蛋白可抑制大肠杆菌素M在周质中的作用。通过构建Cmi与TEM-β-内酰胺酶(BlaM)之间的杂合蛋白来确定Cmi的亚细胞定位,只有当BlaM借助Cmi转运穿过细胞质膜时,它才会赋予对氨苄青霉素的抗性。赋予对50微克/毫升氨苄青霉素抗性的最小Cmi'-BlaM杂合体包含19个Cmi氨基酸残基;仅表达带有五个N端Cmi残基的Cmi'-BlaM的细胞对氨苄青霉素敏感。这些结果支持了一个模型,其中包含第3至23位残基的Cmi疏水序列用于将Cmi的第24至117位残基转运到周质中,并将Cmi锚定在细胞质膜上。第8至23位残基整合在细胞质膜中,不参与Cma的识别。通过用青霉素结合蛋白3(PBP3)的疏水氨基酸序列1至42替换Cmi的第1至23位残基,进一步验证了该模型。在体内实验中,PBP3'-'Cmi与Cmi具有同样的活性,这表明Cmi的转运和锚定不是序列特异性的。用BlaM的可裂解信号肽替换Cmi的23个N端残基,产生了一种有活性的BlaM'-'Cmi杂合蛋白。BlaM'-'Cmi赋予的免疫性很高,但不如与Cmi和PBP3'-'Cmi相关的免疫性高,这表明缺乏膜锚定的可溶性Cmi仍然具有活性,但固定在细胞质膜(Cma的靶位点)上会提高其效率。Cmi delta 1-23保留在细胞质中,不赋予免疫性。我们提出,免疫蛋白在Cma能够到达其在细胞质膜上的靶标之前,就在周质中使大肠杆菌素M失活。