[Electron beam tomography in cost effective diagnosis of coronary heart disease].

BACKGROUND

Electron beam CT (EBCT) can acquire rapid, multiple thin-section tomograms of the beating heart in synchrony with the electrocardiogram and quantity coronary calcification without intravenous contrast. Coronary calcification is an active process exclusively associated with atherosclerotic plaque formation and regulated in a manner similar to the calcification of bone. Clinical studies have demonstrated that EBCT coronary calcification (1) follows a pattern similar to the epidemiology of coronary artery disease (CAD), (2) has a high sensitivity (90-95%) for coronary plaque and significant angiographic coronary stenoses, and (3) has the potential to assess the prognosis of patients with coronary atherosclerotic disease. Coronary calcium area or "score" correlates best with overall plaque burden within the coronary system. However, coronary calcium is of limited value in distinguishing coronary stenosis on a segment-by-segment basis.

EBCT AND CAD

Due to spiraling health care costs, there is a need for cost-efficient strategies in the diagnosis and stratification of patients with known or suspected CAD. There are two major patient groups in which EBCT calcium scanning has a potential for cost-efficient application: (1) in asymptomatic, high-risk patients, identification of significant plaque burden may direct judicious use of long-term drug therapy or further investigation to those individuals most likely to benefit from an aggressive risk factor modification and medical program; (2) in patients with chest pain syndromes but no prior CAD, EBCT calcium scanning compares favorably with conventional diagnostic methods. In particular, using receiver operating characteristic analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of an EBCT calcium score of 80 in detecting obstructive CAD are both about 85%. Using a theoretical model, EBCT calcium scanning was found to be the most cost-effective approach to diagnosis in populations with a low-to-moderate likelihood of obstructive CAD when compared with treadmill exercise, stress thallium, and stress echocardiography.

CONCLUSIONS

EBCT calcium scanning is not a substitute for coronary angiography, but it has clear advantages over other more traditional diagnostic methods for CAD. In particular, it can be performed conveniently and inexpensively in most patients. Additionally, the site and extent of calcification are intimately related to the atherosclerotic plaque burden. The analyses presented suggest that it may also provide a cost-effective clinical alternative in specific subsets of the population.