Barrier J, Roblot P, Ramassamy A, Becq-Giraudon B
Service de médecine interne, centre hospitalier Camille-Guérin, Chatellerault, France.
Rev Med Interne. 1996;17(1):21-4. doi: 10.1016/0248-8663(96)88392-5.
Differential diagnosis between infective endocarditis and septicemia without endocarditis remains a crucial clinical difficulty. Value of immunological data during those pathologies has been evaluated in a 2 year prospective study. Sixty-one patients, admitted in an internal medicine and infectious diseases unit for a documented infectious disease, were included. They were separated in three groups: group I (n = 21): demonstrated infective endocarditis; group II (n = 19): septicemia without endocarditis and group III (n = 21): non septicemic well-defined infectious disease. Following parameters were studied: immune circulating complexes, C reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, fibrinogen, rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies, Treponema pallidum serodiagnostic and cryoglobulinemia. There were no differences between the three studied groups. In particular, immune circulating complexes were present in respectively 67%, 58% and 62% of the patients of the three groups. So, presence or absence of immunologic abnormalities does not provide help for diagnosis of endocarditis in a febrile patient.
感染性心内膜炎与无心内膜炎的败血症之间的鉴别诊断仍然是一个关键的临床难题。在一项为期两年的前瞻性研究中,对这些病症期间免疫数据的价值进行了评估。纳入了在内科和传染病科因确诊传染病入院的61例患者。他们被分为三组:第一组(n = 21):确诊为感染性心内膜炎;第二组(n = 19):无心内膜炎的败血症;第三组(n = 21):非败血症性明确传染病。研究了以下参数:循环免疫复合物、C反应蛋白、红细胞沉降率、纤维蛋白原、类风湿因子、抗核抗体、梅毒螺旋体血清诊断和冷球蛋白血症。三组之间没有差异。特别是,三组患者中循环免疫复合物的出现率分别为67%、58%和62%。因此,免疫异常的存在与否无助于发热患者心内膜炎的诊断。