Joseph R, Tria L, Mossey R T, Bellucci A G, Mailloux L U, Vernace M A, Miller I, Wilkes B M
Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 1996 Apr;27(4):566-72. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(96)90168-7.
Serum albumin levels have been used extensively as an indicator of morbidity in patients with end-stage renal disease. Recent evidence suggests that albumin levels vary considerably in hemodialysis patients depending on the laboratory method used, but formulas for comparing albumin values by different methods have not been developed. We prospectively evaluated the effects of measuring albumin by three different methods on paired plasma and serum from 23 patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and 53 patients on chronic maintenance hemodialysis. Plasma and serum gave virtually identical results independent of method used. In CAPD patients, bromcresol green and nephelometry gave nearly identical albumin measurements through the entire range of plasma levels. In contrast, bromcresol purple gave values that were 9.9 percent +/- 1.3 percent lower (P < 0.05). Hemodialysis patients showed a similar pattern with close agreement between bromcresol green and nephelometry, but bromcresol purple gave lower albumin levels by 19.1 percent +/- 1.2 percent (P < 0.05). The discrepancy in albumin in CAPD patients was significantly less than in the hemodialysis patients (P < 0.05), suggesting that there were fewer interfering substances in the blood of CAPD patients than in hemodialysis patients. Linear regression analysis was used to develop simple formulas for comparing albumin values obtained by the different methods in CAPD and hemodialysis patients. These studies show that values for albumin in blood vary significantly by method of analysis in CAPD and hemodialysis patients. By the use of these formulas, it becomes possible to compare albumin values between centers using different methods for the purpose of quality management.
血清白蛋白水平已被广泛用作终末期肾病患者发病情况的指标。最近有证据表明,血液透析患者的白蛋白水平因所使用的实验室方法不同而有很大差异,但尚未开发出用于比较不同方法所测白蛋白值的公式。我们前瞻性地评估了三种不同方法测量白蛋白对23例持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)患者和53例慢性维持性血液透析患者的配对血浆和血清的影响。无论使用何种方法,血浆和血清的结果几乎相同。在CAPD患者中,溴甲酚绿法和散射比浊法在整个血浆水平范围内测得的白蛋白值几乎相同。相比之下,溴甲酚紫法测得的值低9.9%±1.3%(P<0.05)。血液透析患者也呈现类似模式,溴甲酚绿法和散射比浊法结果相近,但溴甲酚紫法测得的白蛋白水平低19.1%±1.2%(P<0.05)。CAPD患者白蛋白的差异明显小于血液透析患者(P<0.05),这表明CAPD患者血液中的干扰物质比血液透析患者少。采用线性回归分析得出了用于比较CAPD和血液透析患者不同方法所测白蛋白值的简单公式。这些研究表明,CAPD和血液透析患者血液中白蛋白的值因分析方法不同而有显著差异。通过使用这些公式,就可以在质量管理中对采用不同方法的各中心之间的白蛋白值进行比较。