Suppr超能文献

头孢吡肟的安全性:一种新型广谱肠外头孢菌素。

Safety of cefepime: a new extended-spectrum parenteral cephalosporin.

作者信息

Neu H C

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases/Epidemiology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York 10032, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1996 Jun 24;100(6A):68S-75S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(96)00110-6.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety profile of cefepime, a new extended-spectrum, fourth-generation cephalosporin used to treat mild-to-severe bacterial infections, with that of ceftazidime. A total of 2,032 patients enrolled in North American and European cefepime trials were analyzed. The study population spanned adolescence to the elderly (15-100 years); the median age was 62 years. Cefepime was compared with ceftazidime (1,456 patients), a third-generation cephalosporin. Cefepime dosing was 1-4 g/day (0.5-2.0 g twice daily) for adults; ceftazidime dosing was 1-6 g/day (0.5 g every 12 hours to 2.0 g every 8 hours). A limited number of cefepime-treated patients received 2 g every 8 hours. The median length of dosing for both cefepime and ceftazidime was 7 days. In randomized trials in which cefepime (2,032 patients) was compared with ceftazidime (1,456 patients), analysis of comparative data indicated that adverse events of probable or unknown relation to study drugs were observed in 13.8% of cefepime patients and 15.6% of ceftazidime patients. The most commonly observed adverse event for cefepime was headache (2.4%), followed by nausea (1.8%), rash (1.8%), and diarrhea (1.7%). For ceftazidime, the most commonly observed adverse event was diarrhea (3.2%), followed by headache (2.5%), nausea (2.1%), rash (1.9%), and constipation (1.5%). The incidence of positive Coombs' test was higher in high-dose cefepime recipients than in ceftazidime recipients (14.5% vs 8.7%; p = 0.043), although there was no evidence of hemolysis in either treatment group. Coadministration of analgesics, diuretics, and anticoagulants did not increase incidence of adverse events associated with study-drug therapy. Adverse renal and hematologic events, as well as anaphylaxis and death, were rare in both groups. In the comparative trials with cefepime, anaphylaxis was reported in no patients receiving cefepime and in one patient receiving ceftazidime. None of the three seizures reported in patients receiving cefepime and one of six seizures in patients receiving ceftazidime were of probable or possible relationship to the study drugs. None of the 12 cases of gastrointestinal hemorrhage reported in cefepime patients or five cases reported in ceftazidime patients were judged to be related to treatment drug. Tolerance for intravenous administration in both treatment groups was similar. Cefepime did not effect any significant or unusual allergic, hematologic, gastrointestinal, neurologic, or renal toxicity when administered to patients with mild-to-severe infections, including those receiving concomitant medications. The safety profile of cefepime is excellent and comparable to that of ceftazidime and those reported for other cephalosporins.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较头孢吡肟(一种用于治疗轻至重度细菌感染的新型广谱、第四代头孢菌素)与头孢他啶的安全性。对北美和欧洲头孢吡肟试验中纳入的2032例患者进行了分析。研究人群涵盖青少年至老年人(15 - 100岁);中位年龄为62岁。将头孢吡肟与头孢他啶(1456例患者)进行比较,头孢他啶是一种第三代头孢菌素。成人头孢吡肟的给药剂量为1 - 4g/天(0.5 - 2.0g,每日两次);头孢他啶的给药剂量为1 - 6g/天(每12小时0.5g至每8小时2.0g)。少数接受头孢吡肟治疗的患者每8小时接受2g剂量。头孢吡肟和头孢他啶的中位给药时长均为7天。在头孢吡肟(2032例患者)与头孢他啶(1456例患者)的随机试验中,对比较数据的分析表明,在13.8%的头孢吡肟患者和15.6%的头孢他啶患者中观察到了可能与研究药物相关或关系不明的不良事件。头孢吡肟最常观察到的不良事件是头痛(2.4%),其次是恶心(1.8%)、皮疹(1.8%)和腹泻(1.7%)。对于头孢他啶,最常观察到的不良事件是腹泻(3.2%),其次是头痛(2.5%)、恶心(2.1%)、皮疹(1.9%)和便秘(1.5%)。高剂量头孢吡肟接受者的库姆斯试验阳性发生率高于头孢他啶接受者(14.5%对8.7%;p = 0.043),尽管在两个治疗组中均无溶血证据。镇痛药、利尿剂和抗凝剂的联合使用并未增加与研究药物治疗相关的不良事件发生率。两组中不良肾脏和血液学事件以及过敏反应和死亡均罕见。在与头孢吡肟的比较试验中,接受头孢吡肟的患者中无过敏反应报告,接受头孢他啶的患者中有1例报告过敏反应。接受头孢吡肟患者报告的3次癫痫发作及接受头孢他啶患者报告的6次癫痫发作中,均无可能或可能与研究药物相关的情况。头孢吡肟患者报告的12例胃肠道出血病例及头孢他啶患者报告的5例病例中,均未判定与治疗药物有关。两个治疗组对静脉给药的耐受性相似。在给轻至重度感染患者(包括接受联合用药的患者)使用头孢吡肟时,未产生任何显著或异常的过敏、血液学、胃肠道、神经学或肾脏毒性。头孢吡肟具有出色的安全性,与头孢他啶以及其他头孢菌素报告的安全性相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验