• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小儿喉罩气道的拔除:麻醉状态与清醒状态的比较

Removal of the laryngeal mask airway in children: anaesthetized compared with awake.

作者信息

Kitching A J, Walpole A R, Blogg C E

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Anaethetics, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 1996 Jun;76(6):874-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/76.6.874.

DOI:10.1093/bja/76.6.874
PMID:8679367
Abstract

We studied 60 children, aged 12 months to 8 yr, undergoing plastic surgery under general anaesthesia supplemented by regional anaesthesia. Patients were allocated randomly to have the laryngeal mask airway removed either on awakening or while anaesthetized. Subsequent observation of respiratory factors and oxygen saturation showed a significant difference between the groups for coughing (P < 0.001), with a greater incidence (17 of 33) in the awake group compared with those from whom the laryngeal mask airway was removed while anaesthetized (two of 27). There were no differences in the incidences of laryngospasm, desaturation (< 95%) and excess salivation between the groups. Removed of the laryngeal mask airway during deep anaesthesia reduced coughing in the immediate postoperative period.

摘要

我们研究了60名年龄在12个月至8岁之间、接受全身麻醉并辅以区域麻醉的整形手术儿童。患者被随机分配在苏醒时或麻醉状态下拔除喉罩气道。随后对呼吸因素和血氧饱和度的观察显示,两组在咳嗽方面存在显著差异(P < 0.001),苏醒组的发生率更高(33例中有17例),而在麻醉状态下拔除喉罩气道的组(27例中有2例)发生率较低。两组在喉痉挛、血氧饱和度降低(< 95%)和唾液过多的发生率方面没有差异。在深度麻醉期间拔除喉罩气道可减少术后即刻的咳嗽。

相似文献

1
Removal of the laryngeal mask airway in children: anaesthetized compared with awake.小儿喉罩气道的拔除:麻醉状态与清醒状态的比较
Br J Anaesth. 1996 Jun;76(6):874-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/76.6.874.
2
Removal of the laryngeal mask airway: factors affecting the incidence of post-operative adverse respiratory events in 300 patients.喉罩气道的拔除:影响300例患者术后不良呼吸事件发生率的因素
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1999 Apr;16(4):251-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.1999.00476.x.
3
Removal of the laryngeal tube in children: anaesthetized compared with awake.儿童喉罩拔除:麻醉状态与清醒状态的比较
Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jun;98(6):802-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem070. Epub 2007 Apr 7.
4
Effect of removal of AuraOnce™ laryngeal mask in awake or deep anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.清醒或深度麻醉状态下移除AuraOnce™喉罩的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Afr Health Sci. 2019 Dec;19(4):2954-2963. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v19i4.16.
5
Complications associated with removal of the laryngeal mask airway: a comparison of removal in deeply anaesthetised versus awake patients.
Can J Anaesth. 1995 Dec;42(12):1113-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03015098.
6
Minimum alveolar concentration of desflurane with fentanyl for laryngeal mask airway removal in anesthetized children.七氟醚与芬太尼用于麻醉儿童喉罩拔除时的最低肺泡有效浓度
Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Apr;22(4):335-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03712.x. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
7
Awake removal of the laryngeal mask airway is safe in paediatric patients.
Can J Anaesth. 1998 Feb;45(2):150-2. doi: 10.1007/BF03013254.
8
Removal of Laryngeal Mask Airway in Adults Under Target-Controlled, Propofol-Fentanyl Infusion Anesthesia: Awake or Deep Anesthesia?靶控丙泊酚-芬太尼输注麻醉下成年患者喉罩气道的拔除:清醒拔管还是深麻醉下拔管?
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Apr;95(17):e3441. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003441.
9
Use of laryngeal mask airway in children with upper respiratory tract infection, compared with face mask: randomized, single blind, clinical trial.与面罩相比,喉罩在患有上呼吸道感染儿童中的应用:随机、单盲临床试验。
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2011 Dec;49(4):136-40. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2011.11.008. Epub 2011 Dec 17.
10
Respiratory complications associated with tracheal extubation. Timing of tracheal extubation and use of the laryngeal mask during emergence from anaesthesia.气管插管拔除相关的呼吸并发症。麻醉苏醒期气管插管拔除的时机及喉罩的使用。
Anaesthesia. 1998 Jun;53(6):540-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00397.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety of removal of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children in the supine versus lateral position in a deep plane of anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.在深度麻醉平面下,儿童仰卧位与侧卧位拔除食管引流型喉罩气道的安全性:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatr Investig. 2023 Sep 26;7(4):233-238. doi: 10.1002/ped4.12401. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Adverse Respiratory Events After Removal of Laryngeal Mask Airway in Deep Anesthesia Versus Awake State in Children: A Randomized Trial.小儿深度麻醉与清醒状态下拔除喉罩气道后的不良呼吸事件:一项随机试验
Cureus. 2022 Apr 19;14(4):e24296. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24296. eCollection 2022 Apr.
3
Deep vs. Awake Extubation and LMA Removal in Terms of Airway Complications in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Anesthesia: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.
小儿麻醉患者气道并发症方面深拔管与清醒拔管及喉罩移除的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2018 Oct 14;7(10):353. doi: 10.3390/jcm7100353.
4
Anesthetic management of craniopagus conjoined twins in a remote location.偏远地区颅骨联体双胎的麻醉管理
Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 Oct-Dec;11(4):516-517. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_288_17.
5
Removal of Laryngeal Mask Airway in Adults Under Target-Controlled, Propofol-Fentanyl Infusion Anesthesia: Awake or Deep Anesthesia?靶控丙泊酚-芬太尼输注麻醉下成年患者喉罩气道的拔除:清醒拔管还是深麻醉下拔管?
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Apr;95(17):e3441. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003441.
6
Early versus late removal of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for general anaesthesia.全身麻醉时喉罩气道(LMA)早期与晚期拔除的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 10;2015(8):CD007082. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007082.pub2.
7
Effective dose 50 of desflurane for laryngeal mask airway removal in anaesthetized children in cataract surgeries with subtenon block.在接受球后阻滞的白内障手术麻醉儿童中,用于拔除喉罩的地氟烷有效剂量50。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2015 Jan;9(1):27-32. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.146277.
8
Caudal analgesia reduces the sevoflurane requirement for LMA removal in anesthetized children.骶麻降低了麻醉儿童在拔除喉罩时对七氟醚的需求。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010 Jun;58(6):527-31. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2010.58.6.527. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
9
Removal of laryngeal mask airway: awake vs anesthetized.喉罩气道移除:清醒状态与麻醉状态对比
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010 Jun;58(6):507. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2010.58.6.507. Epub 2010 Jun 23.