• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[使用腹壁牵开器的免气腹腹腔镜胆囊切除术]

[Gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy using retractor of the abdominal wall].

作者信息

D'Urbano C, Fuertes Guiro F, Sampietro R

机构信息

Divisione Chirurgica 7P "P. Bucalossi", Ospedale San Carlo Borromeo, Milano.

出版信息

G Chir. 1996 Mar;17(3):121-4.

PMID:8679422
Abstract

The Authors present a new gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy method using an abdominal wall elevator with subcutaneous traction ("laparotenser"). Fifty patients between May 1994 and March 1995 were operated by videolaparoscopy using this new gasless method. Twenty of them were operated with Nagai's method while the laparotenser was used in the remaining thirty. The results obtained are similar to those using pneumoperitoneum. It has been observed a global reduction of costs, less postoperative pain, no influence in cardiovascular and metabolic indexes. No complications were reported during the postoperative period but two cases of conversion to laparotomy not related to the method used were needed. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without pneumoperitoneum using the subcutaneous elevator of the abdominal wall ("laparotenser") has demonstrated that it's possible to operate in a working space similar to that created by the pneumoperitoneum. After an initial period of distrust towards the laparoscopic methods without pneumoperitoneum it has been accepted that gasless methods multiply the indications to minimally invasive surgery in patients with cardiorespiratory problems considered no ideal candidates to laparoscopic cholecystectomy with pneumoperitoneum.

摘要

作者介绍了一种使用带皮下牵引的腹壁提升器(“laparotenser”)的新型无气腹腔镜胆囊切除术方法。1994年5月至1995年3月期间,50例患者采用这种新型无气方法进行了视频腹腔镜手术。其中20例采用长井法手术,其余30例使用laparotenser。所获得的结果与使用气腹法的结果相似。已观察到成本总体降低、术后疼痛减轻、对心血管和代谢指标无影响。术后期间未报告并发症,但有2例转为开腹手术,与所使用的方法无关。使用腹壁皮下提升器(“laparotenser”)进行无气腹腹腔镜胆囊切除术已证明,在类似于气腹所创造的工作空间中进行手术是可行的。在最初对无气腹腹腔镜方法存在不信任之后,现在已经认识到,无气方法增加了对那些被认为不是气腹腹腔镜胆囊切除术理想候选人的心肺问题患者进行微创手术的适应症。

相似文献

1
[Gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy using retractor of the abdominal wall].[使用腹壁牵开器的免气腹腹腔镜胆囊切除术]
G Chir. 1996 Mar;17(3):121-4.
2
The gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy.非气腹腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1995 Feb;3(1):76-80.
3
Gasless laparoscopy could avoid alterations in hepatic function.免气腹腹腔镜检查可避免肝功能改变。
Surg Endosc. 2001 Jul;15(7):741-6. doi: 10.1007/s004640090020. Epub 2001 Apr 3.
4
[Use of abdominal wall retractor Laparo Tenser in gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy].
Ann Ital Chir. 2002 Mar-Apr;73(2):143-7; discussion 147-8.
5
[Gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy].[非气腹腹腔镜胆囊切除术]
Zentralbl Chir. 1994;119(6):383-7.
6
Costs and benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: abdominal wall lifting vs. pneumoperitoneum procedure.腹腔镜胆囊切除术的成本与效益:腹壁提拉术与气腹术的比较
Hepatogastroenterology. 2006 Jul-Aug;53(70):497-500.
7
[Gasless versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized trial with regard to technical problems, postoperative course and convalescence].[无气腹与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术:关于技术问题、术后过程及康复的一项随机试验]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2002 Apr 29;164(18):2398-402.
8
Experience with a new design of endoretractor for gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010 Dec;20(6):416-9. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182002fd0.
9
Hemodynamic changes during gaseous and gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy.气腹与非气腹腹腔镜胆囊切除术期间的血流动力学变化
Surg Today. 2002;32(8):685-9. doi: 10.1007/s005950200127.
10
[Gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Our experience with 130 cases compared with 450 cases treated with the CO2 technique].
Minerva Chir. 2000 Apr;55(4):201-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of gasless laparoscopy in differential diagnosis of acute abdomen.无气腹腔镜在急腹症鉴别诊断中的作用
Hippokratia. 2015 Jan-Mar;19(1):69-72.