Moga M A, Arvatescu C A, Pratilas G C, Bigiu N F, Dinas K, Burtea V
Faculty of Medicine, Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania.
Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Hippokratia. 2015 Jan-Mar;19(1):69-72.
The diagnosis of acute abdomen in the emergency setting, still remains a challenging problem. In these cases timely diagnosis and management is of great importance, while the anesthetic risk is high. The combination of the risk of an open laparotomy and the relative high likelihood of negative findings when performed, creates the need for a better approach. The alternative actually exists since 1911 when Eruheim made the first gasless laparoscopy. The aim of this study is to put back into the spotlight, gasless laparoscopy in the differential diagnosis of acute abdomen and to underline the advantages of this simple, cheap and very useful technique, especially in patients that require prompt diagnosis and have relative or absolute contraindications to general anesthesia or pneumoperitoneum.
This study included 49 patients that were managed with gasless laparoscopy for the diagnosis of acute abdomen, from 2011 to 2013. Two techniques were used: the mechanical lift of the anterior abdominal wall and the LapVision device.
From the 49 patients included in the study, 41 were diagnosed with gasless laparoscopy while in eight the results were uncertain or there wasn't any pathology involved. With both techniques used, sample of the intraperitoneal fluid or biopsy could be obtained.
The gasless technique for laparoscopy is an extremely useful mean of diagnosis in emergency conditions, or for patients with contraindications to undergo laparoscopy by pneumoperitoneum. Requiring only local or regional anesthesia, this technique could easily find application in diagnosis and treatment, while avoiding unnecessary laparotomies. Hippokratia 2015, 19 (1): 69-72.
在急诊环境中,急腹症的诊断仍然是一个具有挑战性的问题。在这些情况下,及时诊断和处理至关重要,同时麻醉风险很高。开腹手术的风险与手术时出现阴性结果的相对高可能性相结合,使得需要一种更好的方法。自1911年厄鲁海姆首次进行无气腹腔镜检查以来,替代方法实际上就已存在。本研究的目的是重新关注无气腹腔镜检查在急腹症鉴别诊断中的应用,并强调这种简单、廉价且非常有用的技术的优势,特别是在需要快速诊断且对全身麻醉或气腹有相对或绝对禁忌证的患者中。
本研究纳入了2011年至2013年期间接受无气腹腔镜检查以诊断急腹症的49例患者。使用了两种技术:前腹壁的机械提升和LapVision设备。
在纳入研究的49例患者中,41例通过无气腹腔镜检查得到诊断,8例结果不确定或未发现任何病理情况。使用这两种技术时,均可获取腹腔内液体样本或进行活检。
无气腹腔镜技术是急诊情况下或有气腹腹腔镜检查禁忌证患者的一种极其有用的诊断手段。该技术仅需局部或区域麻醉,可轻松应用于诊断和治疗,同时避免不必要的开腹手术。《希波克拉底》2015年,第19卷(第1期):69 - 72页。