Suppr超能文献

一项残疾患病率研究中的方法学问题:南非米切尔平原

Methodological issues in a disablement prevalence study: Mitchells Plain, South Africa.

作者信息

Katzenellenbogen J, Joubert G, Rendall K, Coetzee T

机构信息

Centre for Epidemiological Research in Southern Africa, SA Medical Research Council, South Africa.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 1995 Oct;17(7):350-7. doi: 10.3109/09638289509166721.

Abstract

The Mitchells Plain Disability Survey was undertaken primarily to expand a community-based rehabilitation programme in an underprivileged South African urban community. This descriptive survey used a proportional stratified random cluster sampling strategy (sample size 2424), with stratification by suburb and clusters consisting of 15 adjacent plots. A household screening questionnaire (based on the WHO disability questionnaire), identified people who reported health problems affecting their functional ability, while a second follow-up interview confirmed disablement status and obtained a medical, disablement and demographic profile of the disabled and ascertained their needs. This paper discusses different methodological issues related to the survey design and emphasizes the need for standardization of methods in the disablement field. Sampling issues include sample loss in a multi-staged data collection strategy as well as the non-independence of observations when sampling entire house- holds. The trade-off between studying disability across diagnostic, disablement and age categories, and wide confidence intervals for specific prevalence rates, is discussed. Because of the prohibitive costs validation of disablement status is often omitted in a low-budget project (as this one was), weakening the design of such studies. Even if the 'disabled' are correctly identified, the criteria for identifying respondents determine what type of disablement prevalence will be obtained, Different diagnoses reported on screening yielded different positive predictive values of disability--the most debilitating conditions yielding the highest proportion of disabled people. The quality of the data--evaluated through comparisons of initial and repeat screening interviews, and proxy and self-reporting--is described. There is a need for disability research to continue developing suitable methods for a wide range of purposes. One such is a 'good-enough' survey design which can be implemented rapidly, at relatively low cost, to yield useful results at local level.

摘要

米切尔平原残疾调查主要是为了在南非一个贫困的城市社区扩展一项基于社区的康复计划。这项描述性调查采用了按比例分层随机整群抽样策略(样本量为2424),按郊区分层,每个群由15个相邻地块组成。一份家庭筛查问卷(基于世界卫生组织残疾问卷)识别出那些报告有影响其功能能力的健康问题的人,而第二次随访访谈则确认残疾状况,并获取残疾人士的医疗、残疾和人口统计学资料,确定他们的需求。本文讨论了与调查设计相关的不同方法学问题,并强调了在残疾领域方法标准化的必要性。抽样问题包括多阶段数据收集策略中的样本流失以及对整个家庭进行抽样时观测值的非独立性。讨论了在跨诊断、残疾和年龄类别研究残疾情况与特定患病率的宽置信区间之间的权衡。由于成本过高,在低预算项目(如本项目)中往往会省略残疾状况的验证,从而削弱了此类研究的设计。即使正确识别了“残疾人”,识别受访者的标准也决定了将获得何种类型的残疾患病率,筛查中报告的不同诊断产生了不同的残疾阳性预测值——最使人衰弱的疾病导致残疾人比例最高。描述了通过比较初次和重复筛查访谈以及代理报告和自我报告来评估的数据质量。残疾研究需要继续为广泛的目的开发合适的方法。其中之一是一种“足够好”的调查设计,它可以以相对较低的成本快速实施,在地方层面产生有用的结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验