Pucheu A, Dierhas M, Leduc B, Sillet-Bach I, Lefort S, Assaf W, Pucheu M
Service de cardiologie, centre hospitalier, Brive, France.
Bull Cancer. 1996 Apr;83(4):293-9.
The main complication of totally implantable venous access devices is deep venous thrombosis on catheter. It may dramatically reduce the already limited venous capacity of patients undergoing chemotherapy and obturate catheters, causing pulmonary embolism or functional disorders. These thromboses usually involve veins of the superior vena cava system where the catheters are implanted. Generally, they occur early, are extensive and often asymptomatic. Doppler ultrasonography is the diagnostic investigation of choice, phlebography being reserved for particular cases or to specify the limits of the thrombus. In a series of 412 vein access devices implanted and systematically monitored by Doppler ultrasonography, we found 57 thromboses (13.8%), 15 partial and 42 complete. The lowest thrombosis rate was observed in the right internal jugular vein (10% vs 20 to 23%, p = 0.006). Thirty-two patients received a systemic fibrinolytic treatment, 16 with streptokinase (SK), five with urokinase (UK), four with tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and seven with SK/UK association. No serious side effects were observed. Sixteen repermeabilizations (50% of fibrinolysis) were obtained. There were no significant differences with respect to the fibrinolytic, the initial characteristics of thrombosis or the patients. Patients without fibrinolysis received 3 weeks of low molecular weight heparin (curative doses) then warfarin. Only one patient was repermeabilized with this treatment (significative difference with fibrinolysis: p = 0.009). Fibrinolysis is indicated in symptomatic thrombosis and/or in cases of extension to the innominate vein or the superior vena cava. Systematic monitoring by Doppler ultrasonography and prophylactic anti-thrombotic treatment are recommended in patients with implantable venous access devices in order to decrease the occurrence of thromboses, to detect asymptomatic patients at an early stage and to increase the effectiveness of fibrinolysis.
全植入式静脉通路装置的主要并发症是导管相关的深静脉血栓形成。这可能会显著降低化疗患者本就有限的静脉容量,并使导管堵塞,从而导致肺栓塞或功能障碍。这些血栓通常累及导管植入部位的上腔静脉系统的静脉。一般来说,它们出现较早,范围广泛,且常常没有症状。多普勒超声检查是首选的诊断方法,静脉造影则用于特殊情况或明确血栓的范围。在一组通过多普勒超声检查进行系统监测的412例植入静脉通路装置的患者中,我们发现了57例血栓形成(13.8%),其中15例为部分血栓,42例为完全血栓。右侧颈内静脉的血栓形成率最低(10%,而其他部位为20%至23%,p = 0.006)。32例患者接受了全身溶栓治疗,其中16例使用链激酶(SK),5例使用尿激酶(UK),4例使用组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt - PA),7例使用SK/UK联合治疗。未观察到严重的副作用。获得了16例再通(溶栓治疗的50%)。在溶栓治疗、血栓形成的初始特征或患者方面,均未发现显著差异。未接受溶栓治疗的患者接受了3周的低分子量肝素(治疗剂量),然后使用华法林。只有1例患者通过这种治疗实现了再通(与溶栓治疗有显著差异:p = 0.009)。有症状的血栓形成和/或血栓扩展至无名静脉或上腔静脉的情况需要进行溶栓治疗。对于植入静脉通路装置的患者,建议通过多普勒超声检查进行系统监测和预防性抗血栓治疗,以减少血栓形成的发生,早期发现无症状患者,并提高溶栓治疗的效果。