Suppr超能文献

自我管理问卷与临床检查的口腔健康数据比较。

Comparison of oral health data from self-administered questionnaire and clinical examination.

作者信息

Axelsson G, Helgadóttir S

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.

出版信息

Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1995 Dec;23(6):365-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1995.tb00264.x.

Abstract

In order to assess the validity of self-reported oral health data 319 subjects randomly selected from the respondents to an oral health survey were examined clinically. The level of agreement between the two methods of examination was estimated by the kappa statistic. Substantial agreement (kappa = 0.65) was found between the reported and observed number of remaining teeth and the difference between underreporting and overreporting was small. The results indicate that valid data for planning purposes and for monitoring changes in such oral health indicators as the proportion of individuals having 28 or more teeth, the proportion of subjects having a minimum of 20 functional teeth, the level of edentulousness and the presence of complete and partial dentures, can be obtained from postal questionnaires.

摘要

为评估自我报告的口腔健康数据的有效性,从一项口腔健康调查的受访者中随机选取319名受试者进行临床检查。通过kappa统计量估计两种检查方法之间的一致性水平。在报告的和观察到的剩余牙齿数量之间发现了高度一致性(kappa = 0.65),漏报和多报之间的差异很小。结果表明,对于规划目的以及监测诸如拥有28颗或更多牙齿的个体比例、至少拥有20颗功能牙的受试者比例、无牙水平以及全口和局部义齿的存在等口腔健康指标的变化而言,可以从邮寄问卷调查中获得有效数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验