Gambhir D S, Bhargava M, Nair M, Arora R, Khalilullah M
Department of Cardiology, GB Pant Hospital, New Delhi.
Indian Heart J. 1996 Mar-Apr;48(2):133-7.
Electrophysiologic effects and the efficacy of single-dose intravenous (i.v.) amiodarone were compared with those of long-term oral therapy in 9 patients of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) utilising slow pathway (SP) for anterograde and fast pathway (FP) for retrograde conduction. Electrophysiologic data were obtained by programmed electrical stimulation (PES) before, 15 to 30 minutes after i.v. amiodarone (5 mg/kg body-weight over 10 minutes) and a mean of 64.6 +/- 23.7 days after oral therapy, on a maintenance dose of 200 to 400 mg daily. There was no significant influence on the sinus cycle length and infranodal conduction (HV) by i.v. or oral amiodarone as compared to pre-drug values. AV nodal conduction, evaluated by AH interval, increased significantly and comparably with both (8% after i.v., 10% after oral; p = NS). Anterograde conduction through SP, as evidenced by pacing cycle length producing AH block, was prolonged by both (31% after i.v., 52% after oral; p = NS). Oral amiodarone, however, was more effective than i.v. in lengthening the effective refractory period (ERP) of anterograde FP (45% vs 17%, p < 0.05). Although both depressed retrograde conduction significantly, long-term oral amiodarone was more effective in prolonging the paced cycle length (PCL) producing ventriculoatrial (VA) block (79% vs 50%; p < 0.05) and ERP of VA conduction system (72% vs 42%; p < 0.01). AVNRT was successfully terminated in 7 patients after i.v. amiodarone. However, tachycardia was reinducible in 3 patients after i.v. and in none after long-term oral therapy. None had clinical recurrence of tachycardia on maintenance oral therapy. The mean concentration of the drug was 3.1 +/- 1.81 micrograms/ml after i.v. and 1.3 +/- 0.47 micrograms/ml after oral therapy (p < 0.05). These results. suggest that i.v. amiodarone terminated AVNRT by depressing both anterograde and retrograde limbs of the reentrant circuit and eventually blocking one of these. Oral therapy prevented recurrence and reinducibility by its predominant effect in prolonging refractoriness of the atrium and ventricle, and depressing conduction through the retrograde FP. It is concluded that i.v. amiodarone is an effective drug in acute termination of tachycardia mediated by AV nodal reentry and that long-term oral therapy is excellent in preventing recurrence and reinducibility of tachycardia. There are significant differences in the electrophysiologic properties and mechanism of action between the two forms, not influenced by the blood levels of amiodarone.
在9例利用慢径路(SP)进行前向传导和快径路(FP)进行逆向传导的房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)患者中,比较了单剂量静脉注射(i.v.)胺碘酮与长期口服治疗的电生理效应和疗效。在静脉注射胺碘酮(10分钟内5mg/kg体重)前、注射后15至30分钟以及口服治疗平均64.6±23.7天后(每日维持剂量200至400mg),通过程控电刺激(PES)获取电生理数据。与用药前值相比,静脉注射或口服胺碘酮对窦性周期长度和结下传导(HV)均无显著影响。通过AH间期评估的房室结传导显著增加,两种治疗方式相当(静脉注射后增加8%,口服后增加10%;p=无显著性差异)。两种治疗方式均使通过SP的前向传导延长,表现为产生AH阻滞的起搏周期长度延长(静脉注射后延长31%,口服后延长52%;p=无显著性差异)。然而,口服胺碘酮在延长前向FP的有效不应期(ERP)方面比静脉注射更有效(45%对17%,p<0.05)。虽然两种治疗方式均显著抑制逆向传导,但长期口服胺碘酮在延长产生室房(VA)阻滞的起搏周期长度(PCL)方面更有效(79%对50%;p<0.05),在延长VA传导系统的ERP方面也更有效(72%对42%;p<0.01)。静脉注射胺碘酮后,7例患者的AVNRT成功终止。然而,静脉注射后3例患者的心动过速可再次诱发,而长期口服治疗后无一例可再次诱发。维持口服治疗期间,无一例患者心动过速临床复发。静脉注射后药物平均浓度为3.1±1.81μg/ml,口服治疗后为1.3±0.47μg/ml(p<0.05)。这些结果表明,静脉注射胺碘酮通过抑制折返环的前向和逆向分支并最终阻断其中之一来终止AVNRT。口服治疗通过其主要作用,即延长心房和心室的不应期以及抑制通过逆向FP的传导,预防复发和再诱发。结论是,静脉注射胺碘酮是急性终止房室结折返介导的心动过速的有效药物,长期口服治疗在预防心动过速的复发和再诱发方面效果极佳。两种给药方式在电生理特性和作用机制上存在显著差异,不受胺碘酮血药浓度影响。