Mettang T, Schenk U, Thomas S, Machleidt C, Kiefer T, Fischer F P, Kuhlmann U
Department of Internal Medicine, Robert Bosch Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
Nephron. 1996;72(2):192-6. doi: 10.1159/000188841.
Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at high risk of hepatitis B infection. Only 50-60% of the patients respond adequately to the routinely performed intramuscular (i.m.) hepatitis B vaccination. We examined whether low dose intradermal (i.d.) application of the vaccine is equivalent to regular i.m. administration. Thirty-two patients with ESRD of different etiologies were investigated at the onset of dialysis treatment [11 patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and 21 patients on hemodialysis (HD)]. Patients were vaccinated at month 0, 1, 3 and 6 with either 40 micrograms HBs Ag (2 ml Engerix B, 14 patients) i.m. or with 10 micrograms HBsAg (0.5 ml Engerix B, 18 patients) i.d. The i.m. vaccination was applied in the deltoid muscle, while for i.d. vaccination the vaccine was injected into the skin of the deltoid region. Six weeks after the last vaccination anti-HBs titers were measured. 61% (11 patients) of the patients vaccinated i.d. and 64% (9 patients) of the patients vaccinated i.m. developed protective titers. Neither the height of the titers nor the proportion of patients responding to the vaccination differed significantly between the two vaccination schedules. No difference regarding the height of titers achieved or the rate of seroconversion could be found when CAPD and HD patients were analyzed separately. Only minor side effects have been observed. According to these preliminary data i.d. hepatitis B vaccination in patients with ESRD may be equivalent to i.m. administration of the vaccine. Given equivalency i.d. vaccination may be a cost-saving alternative to i.m. vaccination (only a quarter of the dose of i.m. administered vaccine is needed) with a good practicability (vaccination can be performed during HD) and a low rate of side effects.
终末期肾病(ESRD)患者感染乙型肝炎的风险很高。只有50%至60%的患者对常规进行的肌肉注射(i.m.)乙型肝炎疫苗接种反应良好。我们研究了低剂量皮内(i.d.)接种疫苗是否等同于常规肌肉注射。在透析治疗开始时,对32例不同病因的ESRD患者进行了研究[11例持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)患者和21例血液透析(HD)患者]。患者在第0、1、3和6个月分别接受40微克乙肝表面抗原(2毫升安在时B,14例患者)肌肉注射或10微克乙肝表面抗原(0.5毫升安在时B,18例患者)皮内注射。肌肉注射疫苗时,将其注射到三角肌;皮内注射疫苗时,将疫苗注射到三角肌区域的皮肤。最后一次接种疫苗六周后,测量抗-HBs滴度。皮内接种疫苗的患者中有61%(11例患者)和肌肉注射疫苗的患者中有64%(9例患者)产生了保护性滴度。两种接种方案在滴度高度或对疫苗有反应的患者比例方面均无显著差异。分别分析CAPD和HD患者时,在达到的滴度高度或血清转化率方面未发现差异。仅观察到轻微的副作用。根据这些初步数据,ESRD患者皮内接种乙型肝炎疫苗可能等同于肌肉注射疫苗。鉴于两者等效,皮内接种疫苗可能是肌肉注射疫苗的一种节省成本的替代方法(仅需肌肉注射疫苗剂量的四分之一),具有良好的实用性(可在血液透析期间进行接种)且副作用发生率低。