• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区长期护理中的协作式质量改进

Collaborative QI in community-based long term care.

作者信息

Freedman J A, Cook C A, Robison T, Kinney E D

机构信息

Research Initiatives and Analysts, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995 Dec;21(12):701-10. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30198-5.

DOI:10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30198-5
PMID:8688926
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In a statewide demonstration project funded by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the state of Indiana, vendors, clients and Indiana University researchers began working together in 1992 to use quality improvement (QI) techniques to improve the delivery of community-based long term care services. QI STRATEGIES: These collaborators, working with state Area Agencies on Aging (AAAs) case managers, are implementing two strategies--Normative Treatment Planning (NTP), which standardizes the clinical assessment of client needs and the prescription of services by case managers, and the Client Feedback System (CFS), a systematic method for obtaining feedback from long term care clients on the quality of in-home services.

CURRENT STATUS

This community-based long term care project has been implemented in AAAs throughout the state of Indiana. In January 1995 the state's 16 AAAs were randomly assigned to four experimental or control groups to assess the project's effectiveness. In the interim, clients are surveyed by telephone every six months to evaluate their satisfaction with services and clinical needs.

LESSONS LEARNED

The experience suggests several lessons: (1) build on existing and successful activities; (2) involve a wide range of participants, not just innovators; (3) obtain buy-in from trade and professional associations that represent program participants; (4) turn national attention given to the program into an asset; (5) conduct separate data collection to evaluate an intervention's success; (6) visit the field often; (7) pay as much attention to program implementation as to development; and (8) provide ongoing, informal educational opportunities for the field.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

This project has resulted in significant movement toward a shared quality improvement vocabulary, information system, and a shared vision of high-quality home care.

摘要

背景

在由罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会资助的一项全州范围的示范项目中,印第安纳州、供应商、客户以及印第安纳大学的研究人员于1992年开始合作,运用质量改进(QI)技术来改善社区长期护理服务的提供。

QI策略:这些合作者与州老年事务区域机构(AAA)的个案经理共同实施两项策略——规范性治疗计划(NTP),该计划使个案经理对客户需求的临床评估和服务处方标准化;以及客户反馈系统(CFS),这是一种从长期护理客户那里获取关于居家服务质量反馈的系统方法。

当前状态

这个基于社区的长期护理项目已在印第安纳州的各个AAA中实施。1995年1月,该州的16个AAA被随机分为四个实验组或对照组,以评估该项目的效果。在此期间,每六个月通过电话对客户进行一次调查,以评估他们对服务和临床需求的满意度。

经验教训

该经验表明了几点教训:(1)基于现有的成功活动;(2)让广泛的参与者参与,而不仅仅是创新者;(3)获得代表项目参与者的行业和专业协会的认可;(4)将国家对该项目的关注转化为一项资产;(5)进行单独的数据收集以评估一项干预措施的成功;(6)经常实地考察;(7)对项目实施和开发给予同样多的关注;(8)为该领域提供持续的非正式教育机会。

总结与结论

该项目已在朝着共享质量改进词汇、信息系统以及高质量居家护理的共同愿景方面取得了重大进展。

相似文献

1
Collaborative QI in community-based long term care.社区长期护理中的协作式质量改进
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995 Dec;21(12):701-10. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30198-5.
2
A randomized trial of two quality improvement strategies implemented in a statewide public community-based, long-term care program.在一项全州范围内基于社区的公共长期护理项目中实施的两种质量改进策略的随机试验。
Med Care. 2003 Sep;41(9):1048-57. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000083744.77092.32.
3
Developing indicators for emergency medical services (EMS) system evaluation and quality improvement: a statewide demonstration and planning project.制定用于紧急医疗服务(EMS)系统评估和质量改进的指标:一项全州范围的示范与规划项目。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001 Mar;27(3):138-54. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(01)27013-8.
4
Assuring the quality of home-delivered long-term care: the Ohio Quality Assurance Project.确保居家长期护理质量:俄亥俄州质量保证项目。
Home Health Care Serv Q. 1989;10(3-4):45-65. doi: 10.1300/j027v10n03_04.
5
Supervision and quality assurance in long-term-care case management.长期护理病例管理中的监督与质量保证。
J Case Manag. 1996 Summer;5(2):65-71.
6
Client satisfaction with service coordinators' provision of home based long-term care services.客户对服务协调员提供的居家长期护理服务的满意度。
Home Health Care Serv Q. 1999;18(1):47-60. doi: 10.1300/j027v18n01_03.
7
Case management as a force for quality assurance and quality improvement in home care.病例管理作为家庭护理中质量保证和质量改进的一股力量。
J Aging Soc Policy. 1997;9(4):5-28. doi: 10.1300/j031v09n04_02.
8
The relative effects of home care client characteristics on the resource allocation process: do personality and demeanor matter?家庭护理客户特征对资源分配过程的相对影响:个性和行为举止重要吗?
Gerontologist. 2002 Dec;42(6):740-50. doi: 10.1093/geront/42.6.740.
9
Adding values: an experiment in systematic attention to values and preferences of community long-term care clients.增添价值:一项系统关注社区长期护理客户价值观和偏好的实验。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1999 Mar;54(2):S109-19. doi: 10.1093/geronb/54b.2.s109.
10
Data for Improvement and Clinical Excellence: a report of an interrupted time series trial of feedback in home care.改善数据与临床卓越性:一项家庭护理反馈的中断时间序列试验报告
Implement Sci. 2017 May 18;12(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0600-1.