Reschly D J
Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, USA.
Future Child. 1996 Spring;6(1):40-53.
Students with disabilities or suspected disabilities are evaluated by schools to determine whether they are eligible for special education services and, if eligible, to determine what services will be provided. In many states, the results of this evaluation also affect how much funding assistance the school will receive to meet the students' special needs. Special education classification is not uniform across states or regions. Students with identical characteristics can be diagnosed as disabled in one state but not in another and may be reclassified when they move across state or school district lines. Most disabilities with a clear medical basis are recognized by the child's physician or parents soon after birth or during the preschool years. In contrast, the majority of students with disabilities are initially referred for evaluation by their classroom teacher (or parents) because of severe and chronic achievement or behavioral problems. There is evidence that the prevalence of some disabilities varies by age, the high-incidence disabilities such as learning disabilities and speech-language disabilities occur primarily at the mild level, the mild disabilities exist on broad continua in which there are no clear demarcations between those who have and those who do not have the disability, and even "mild" disabilities may constitute formidable barriers to academic progress and significantly limit career opportunities. Problems with the current classification system include stigma to the child, low reliability, poor correlation between categorization and treatment, obsolete assumptions still in use in treatment, and disproportionate representation of minority students. Both African-American and Hispanic students are disproportionately represented in special education but in opposite directions. The disproportionately high number of African Americans in special education reflects the fact that more African-American students than white students are diagnosed with mild mental retardation. Though poverty, cultural bias, and inherent differences have been suggested as reasons for this disproportionate representation, there are no compelling data that fully explain the phenomenon. In most states, classification of a student as disabled leads to increased funding from the state to the school district. This article suggests a revised funding system that weights four factors (number of deficits, degree of discrepancy, complexity of intervention, and intensity of intervention) in a regression equation that would yield a total amount of dollars available to support the special education of a particular student.
残疾或疑似残疾的学生由学校进行评估,以确定他们是否有资格获得特殊教育服务,如果有资格,则确定将提供哪些服务。在许多州,该评估结果还会影响学校为满足学生特殊需求而获得的资金援助数额。特殊教育分类在各州或地区并不统一。具有相同特征的学生在一个州可能被诊断为残疾,而在另一个州则不然,并且当他们跨州或学区转学后可能会被重新分类。大多数有明确医学依据的残疾在孩子出生后不久或学龄前就会被其医生或父母发现。相比之下,大多数残疾学生最初是因其严重且长期的学业成绩或行为问题而被其任课教师(或家长)转介进行评估的。有证据表明,某些残疾的患病率因年龄而异,学习障碍和言语语言障碍等高发病率残疾主要处于轻度水平,轻度残疾存在于广泛的连续区间内,在有残疾和无残疾的人之间没有明确的界限,甚至“轻度”残疾也可能对学业进步构成巨大障碍,并严重限制职业机会。当前分类系统存在的问题包括给孩子带来污名、可靠性低、分类与治疗之间相关性差、治疗中仍在使用过时的假设以及少数族裔学生代表性过高。非裔美国学生和西班牙裔学生在特殊教育中的代表性都过高,但方向相反。非裔美国人在特殊教育中的过高比例反映了这样一个事实,即被诊断患有轻度智力障碍的非裔美国学生比白人学生更多。尽管有人提出贫困、文化偏见和固有差异是这种过高比例的原因,但没有令人信服的数据能完全解释这一现象。在大多数州,将学生归类为残疾会导致州政府向学区提供更多资金。本文提出了一种修订后的资金系统,该系统在回归方程中对四个因素(缺陷数量、差异程度、干预复杂性和干预强度)进行加权,从而得出可用于支持特定学生特殊教育的资金总额。