Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2019 Apr 23;50(2):267-282. doi: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-17-0149.
Purpose This study aimed to determine if African American students were disproportionately represented between the years of 2004 and 2014 in the primary disability category of Speech or Language Impairment (S/LI) under the 2004 reauthorized Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. Method S/LI enrollment data from the Office of Special Education Programs and general enrollment data from the National Center for Education Statistics were analyzed to compare the risk of primary S/LI category enrollment of African American students to that of all other students. Risk ratios with 99% confidence intervals were calculated for each state across the 10 years studied. Results An average of 75% of states disproportionately represented African American students in the S/LI category each year; on average, 62% underrepresented African American students, and 14% overrepresented them. A post hoc analysis of the relationship between African American student representation and population densities revealed that states with high African American population densities almost exclusively underrepresented African American students and states with low densities tended toward a proportionate representation. Conclusions African American students were largely underrepresented in the category of S/LI in the years studied. These findings, alongside historic and chronic overrepresentation in other categories of special education, are discussed in the context of the fragmented harm theory ( Payne, 1984 ; Voulgarides, 2018 ; Voulgarides, Zwerger, & Noguera, 2013 ) and the disability rights and critical race theory ( Annamma, Connor, & Ferri, 2013 ). Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.7967024.
目的 本研究旨在确定在 2004 年重新授权的《残疾人教育改善法案》下,2004 年至 2014 年间,非裔美国学生在言语/语言障碍(S/LI)这一主要残疾类别中的比例是否不成比例。
方法 特殊教育计划办公室的 S/LI 入学数据和国家教育统计中心的一般入学数据被分析,以比较非裔美国学生在主要 S/LI 类别的入学风险与所有其他学生的入学风险。在研究的 10 年中,为每个州计算了风险比及其 99%置信区间。
结果 平均而言,75%的州每年在 S/LI 类别中不成比例地代表非裔美国学生;平均而言,有 62%的州低估了非裔美国学生的人数,而有 14%的州高估了他们的人数。对非裔美国学生代表性与人口密度之间关系的事后分析表明,非裔美国人口密度高的州几乎完全低估了非裔美国学生的人数,而人口密度低的州则倾向于按比例代表。
结论 在研究期间,非裔美国学生在 S/LI 类别中大部分被低估。这些发现,加上在其他特殊教育类别的历史和长期过度代表,在碎片化伤害理论(Payne,1984;Voulgarides,2018;Voulgarides,Zwerger,&Noguera,2013)和残疾权利和批判种族理论(Annamma,Connor,&Ferri,2013)的背景下进行了讨论。