• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统胆囊切除术]

[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classical cholecystectomy].

作者信息

Mazuch J, Cupka I, Bruncák P, Géc K, Pelc J, Machan L, Zaher M

机构信息

Chirurgické oddelenie NsP v Lucenci, Slovakia.

出版信息

Bratisl Lek Listy. 1996 Apr;97(4):220-3.

PMID:8689329
Abstract

The authors evaluated the results after classical (CCHE) and laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCHE) in the period from March 16 1994 to June 30 1995. In this period they operated on 408 patients, out of which 208 were operated by the laparoscopic technique. There were no differences in postoperative morbidity. The mortality after laparoscopic surgery was 0% and the classical cholecystectomy reached the morbidity of 1.4%. Complicated patients were usually operated in the classical way. The time of hospitalisation after LCHE was 5.2 days and after CCHE 8.3 days. The results of LCHE were as follows: morbidity 10.5%, conversions 2.4%, reoperations 1.4%, and no leakage of the bile duct. We saved 40% of costs using LCHE. All these facts show that LCHE is advantageous, secure and well tolerated by patients. The patients prefer comfort after the operation, good cosmetic effect and a short hospital isation. CCHE did not lose its position, especially in complicated cases. (Tab. 5, Ref. 21.)

摘要

作者评估了1994年3月16日至1995年6月30日期间经典开腹胆囊切除术(CCHE)和腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LCHE)的结果。在此期间,他们为408例患者实施了手术,其中208例采用腹腔镜技术进行手术。术后发病率无差异。腹腔镜手术后死亡率为0%,经典开腹胆囊切除术的发病率为1.4%。病情复杂的患者通常采用经典手术方式。LCHE术后住院时间为5.2天,CCHE术后为8.3天。LCHE的结果如下:发病率10.5%,中转开腹率2.4%,再次手术率1.4%,且无胆管渗漏。使用LCHE节省了40%的费用。所有这些事实表明,LCHE具有优势、安全且患者耐受性良好。患者更倾向于术后舒适、良好的美容效果和较短的住院时间。CCHE并未失去其地位,尤其是在复杂病例中。(表5,参考文献21。)

相似文献

1
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classical cholecystectomy].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统胆囊切除术]
Bratisl Lek Listy. 1996 Apr;97(4):220-3.
2
[Complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术的并发症]
Med Pregl. 1999 Jun-Aug;52(6-8):253-7.
3
[Complications of cholecystectomy before and after introduction of laparoscopic surgery].[腹腔镜手术引入前后胆囊切除术的并发症]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2001 Feb 5;163(6):763-5.
4
[Causes of unsuccessful attempts of laparoscopic cholecystectomy].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术失败尝试的原因]
Vestn Khir Im I I Grek. 2000;159(1):50-4.
5
[Results of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on morbidity and mortality of gallbladder surgery in a large regional hospital].[大型区域医院引入腹腔镜胆囊切除术对胆囊手术发病率和死亡率的影响结果]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1995 Apr 8;139(14):723-7.
6
Retrospective comparison of outcome of 100 consecutive open cholecystectomies and 100 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies.对连续100例开腹胆囊切除术和连续100例腹腔镜胆囊切除术的结果进行回顾性比较。
South Med J. 1993 Sep;86(9):993-6. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199309000-00003.
7
Outcome evaluation of 10,317 laparoscopic cholecystectomies: a 17-year experience at a single center.10317例腹腔镜胆囊切除术的结果评估:单中心17年经验
Hepatogastroenterology. 2013 Nov-Dec;60(128):1873-6.
8
Laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in surgical training.腹腔镜和开腹胆囊切除术在外科培训中的应用。
Dig Surg. 2010;27(5):384-90. doi: 10.1159/000315905. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
9
A prospective review of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Brunei.文莱腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998 Apr;8(2):120-2.
10
Safety, efficacy, cost, and morbidity of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 228 consecutive patients.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术的安全性、有效性、成本及发病率:对228例连续患者的前瞻性分析
Am Surg. 1993 Jan;59(1):23-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Hem-o-lok clip found in common bile duct after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration: a clinical analysis of 8 cases.腹腔镜胆囊切除术和胆总管探查术后在胆总管中发现 Hem-o-lok 夹:8 例临床分析。
Int J Med Sci. 2012;9(3):225-7. doi: 10.7150/ijms.4023. Epub 2012 Mar 7.