Bloom B S, Fendrick A M
University of Pennsylvania, USA.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996 Winter;12(1):1-8. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300009338.
One of the common ingredients in all attempts to slow escalating health care costs is to control the utilization of services that provide little or uncertain benefit. To reform existing delivery systems, the organization, provision, and financing of health care need to be evaluated critically. Successful reform requires that more rational methods be used to determine which services to provide. The preferences of physicians, patients, and payers of care do not appear optimal from a societal perspective in choosing health care services. While reducing the use of interventions of little or unknown benefit should save money, a policy to restrict the use of medical services may lead to an unwanted result: the underutilization of interventions of proven clinical benefit. Through the determination of the value--by rigorous assessment of both costs and benefits of available alternatives--in a context sensitive to the unique cultural, political, and economic characteristics of individual nations, the health of the population should be improved and growth of health expenditures constrained. This is the first step in health care reform.
所有试图减缓不断攀升的医疗成本的常见举措之一,就是控制那些益处不大或益处不确定的服务的使用。为了改革现有的医疗服务体系,需要对医疗保健的组织、提供和融资进行严格评估。成功的改革要求采用更合理的方法来确定提供哪些服务。从社会角度来看,医生、患者和医疗保健支付者在选择医疗服务时的偏好似乎并非最优。虽然减少使用益处不大或益处不明的干预措施应该能节省资金,但一项限制医疗服务使用的政策可能会导致一个不良后果:已证实具有临床益处的干预措施使用不足。通过在考虑各国独特的文化、政治和经济特征的背景下,通过对现有替代方案的成本和效益进行严格评估来确定价值,应该能够改善民众健康并抑制医疗支出的增长。这是医疗改革的第一步。