• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过国家登记册评估等待时间和优先级设定。

Assessment of waiting time and priority setting by means of a national register.

作者信息

Lundström M, Stenevi U, Thorburn W

机构信息

Karlskrona Central Hospital.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996 Winter;12(1):136-40. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300009454.

DOI:10.1017/s0266462300009454
PMID:8690553
Abstract

To increase access to care for cataract patients in Sweden, it was decided, starting in 1992, that all cataract patients listed for surgery and with priority should have their cataract extraction performed within three months. To evaluate the effect of this waiting time guarantee, a National Cataract Register (NCR) was initiated in late 1991. In 1992, 81% of all cataract extractions performed in Sweden were reported to the NCR; in 1993 this figure was 92%. Reasons for this high participation ratio are discussed. In 1993, 74.4% (range between different clinics, 40-99%) of the patients with priority had their operation performed within three months. Great variation in visual acuity and age was found in patients with priority among the different surgical units.

摘要

为了增加瑞典白内障患者获得治疗的机会,1992年起决定,所有被列入手术名单且具有优先权的白内障患者应在三个月内接受白内障摘除手术。为评估这一等待时间保障措施的效果,1991年末启动了国家白内障登记处(NCR)。1992年,瑞典所有白内障摘除手术的81%被报告给了NCR;1993年这一数字为92%。文中讨论了这一高参与率的原因。1993年,74.4%(不同诊所之间的范围为40 - 99%)具有优先权的患者在三个月内接受了手术。不同手术科室中具有优先权的患者在视力和年龄方面存在很大差异。

相似文献

1
Assessment of waiting time and priority setting by means of a national register.通过国家登记册评估等待时间和优先级设定。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996 Winter;12(1):136-40. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300009454.
2
Assessment of the maximum waiting time guarantee for cataract surgery. The case of a Swedish policy.白内障手术最长等待时间保障评估:以瑞典一项政策为例。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998 Winter;14(1):180-93. doi: 10.1017/s026646230001062x.
3
Indication criteria for cataract extraction and gender differences in waiting time.白内障摘除的适应证标准及等待时间的性别差异。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;92(5):432-8. doi: 10.1111/aos.12230. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
4
Impact of a national system for waitlist prioritization: the experience with NIKE and cataract surgery in Sweden.国家候补名单优先级排序系统的影响:瑞典的 NIKE 与白内障手术经验
Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun;92(4):378-81. doi: 10.1111/aos.12164. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
5
Waiting for cataract surgery--effects of a maximum waiting-time guarantee.等待白内障手术——最长等待时间保障的影响
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007 Jan;12(1):5-10. doi: 10.1258/135581907779497503.
6
The Swedish National Cataract Register: A 9-year review.瑞典国家白内障登记处:9年回顾
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002 Jun;80(3):248-57. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2002.800304.x.
7
The prioritization of patients on waiting lists for cataract surgery: validation of the Western Canada waiting list project cataract priority criteria tool.白内障手术等候名单上患者的优先排序:加拿大西部等候名单项目白内障优先标准工具的验证
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2005 Apr;12(2):81-90. doi: 10.1080/09286580590932770.
8
[More equal care of patients with cataract. Results after implementation of national surgical indicators].[更平等地关爱白内障患者。国家手术指标实施后的结果]
Lakartidningen. 2009;106(26-27):1733-6.
9
Development and assessment of a priority score for cataract surgery.白内障手术优先评分的制定与评估
Can J Ophthalmol. 2004 Feb;39(1):48-55. doi: 10.1016/s0008-4182(04)80052-8.
10
How fair is cataract prioritisation?白内障优先排序的公平性如何?
N Z Med J. 1998 Oct 23;111(1076):405-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Prioritizations in Swedish cataract surgery - when resources are limited-Exemplified by the COVID-19 pandemic.瑞典白内障手术的优先排序——资源有限时——以新冠疫情为例
Acta Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb;103(1):61-68. doi: 10.1111/aos.16749. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
2
Toward systematic reviews to understand the determinants of wait time management success to help decision-makers and managers better manage wait times.旨在进行系统评价,以了解决定等待时间管理成功的因素,帮助决策者和管理者更好地管理等待时间。
Implement Sci. 2013 Jun 6;8:61. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-61.
3
Unmet needs and waiting list prioritization for knee arthroplasty.
膝关节置换术的未满足需求和等待名单排序。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Mar;468(3):789-97. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1163-5.
4
Geographical variations in the benefit of applying a prioritization system for cataract surgery in different regions of Spain.西班牙不同地区应用白内障手术优先排序系统的获益情况的地理差异。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb 4;8:32. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-32.
5
The consequences of waiting for cataract surgery: a systematic review.等待白内障手术的后果:一项系统评价。
CMAJ. 2007 Apr 24;176(9):1285-90. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060962.
6
Determinants of patient satisfaction with cataract surgery and length of time on the waiting list.白内障手术患者满意度及等候名单时长的决定因素。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Oct;88(10):1305-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2003.037721.
7
The Manitoba Cataract Waiting List Program.曼尼托巴省白内障等候名单项目
CMAJ. 2001 Apr 17;164(8):1177-80.
8
Outcome of cataract surgery considering the preoperative situation: a study of possible predictors of the functional outcome.考虑术前情况的白内障手术结果:功能结局可能预测因素的研究
Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Nov;83(11):1272-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.11.1272.
9
Points for pain: waiting list priority scoring systems.疼痛评分:等候名单优先排序评分系统
BMJ. 1999 Feb 13;318(7181):412-4.