• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童的类比问题解决:表面相似性、结构相似性和程序相似性的影响。

Children's analogical problem solving: the effects of superficial, structural, and procedural similarity.

作者信息

Chen Z

机构信息

University of Kentucky, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 1996 Aug;62(3):410-31. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0037.

DOI:10.1006/jecp.1996.0037
PMID:8691121
Abstract

Two experiments with children between 5 and 8 years of age were designed to determine the effects of different types of similarity on analogical problem solving and to explore the cognitive components responsible for these effects. Three dimensions of similarity shared by the source and target problems were manipulated, and children's problem-solving performance was assessed with multiple measures. The results indicate that superficial and structural similarity facilitated the process of drawing analogies. More importantly, the present research demonstrated that procedural similarity influenced the process of applying analogues. The results also indicate that children as young as 5 and 6 years of age are capable of detecting and utilizing similarities in superficial features, structural relations, and procedural operations. Theoretical implications are discussed.

摘要

设计了两项针对5至8岁儿童的实验,以确定不同类型的相似性对类比问题解决的影响,并探究造成这些影响的认知成分。对源问题和目标问题共有的相似性的三个维度进行了操控,并通过多种测量方法评估儿童的问题解决表现。结果表明,表面相似性和结构相似性促进了类比推理过程。更重要的是,本研究表明程序相似性影响了类比应用过程。结果还表明,年仅5、6岁的儿童就能察觉并利用表面特征、结构关系及程序操作方面的相似性。文中讨论了其理论意义。

相似文献

1
Children's analogical problem solving: the effects of superficial, structural, and procedural similarity.儿童的类比问题解决:表面相似性、结构相似性和程序相似性的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1996 Aug;62(3):410-31. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0037.
2
Across the great divide: bridging the gap between understanding of toddlers' and older children's thinking.跨越巨大差异:弥合对幼儿与大龄儿童思维理解之间的差距
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2000;65(2):i-vii, 1-96.
3
Effects of prior assistance in using analogies on young children's unprompted analogical problem solving over time: a microgenetic study.先前使用类比的辅助对幼儿随时间推移的自发类比问题解决的影响:一项微观发生学研究。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2007 Mar;77(Pt 1):43-68. doi: 10.1348/000709906X96923.
4
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.
5
Young children's analogical reasoning across cultures: similarities and differences.跨文化视角下的幼儿类比推理:异同。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Jan-Feb;105(1-2):146-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.08.003. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
6
Cognitive skills in mathematical problem solving in Grade 3.三年级学生在解决数学问题中的认知技能。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2005 Mar;75(Pt 1):119-38. doi: 10.1348/000709904X22287.
7
Development of analogical problem-solving skill.类比问题解决技能的发展。
Child Dev. 1984 Dec;55(6):2042-55.
8
Analogical transfer in the THOG task.THOG任务中的类比迁移。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2004 Apr;57(3):557-70. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000422.
9
A computational account of children's analogical reasoning: balancing inhibitory control in working memory and relational representation.儿童类比推理的计算解释:在工作记忆和关系表示中平衡抑制控制。
Dev Sci. 2011 May;14(3):516-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00999.x. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
10
Concept-procedure interactions in children's addition and subtraction.儿童加减法中的概念与运算交互
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Feb;102(2):131-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The Development of Flexible Problem Solving: An Integrative Approach.灵活问题解决能力的发展:一种综合方法。
J Intell. 2023 Jun 14;11(6):119. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11060119.
2
The Development of Relational Reasoning in South Korean Elementary and Middle-School Students: A Cross-Sectional Investigation.韩国中小学生关系推理能力的发展:一项横断面调查。
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 4;12:630609. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630609. eCollection 2021.
3
Flexibility in Problem Solving: Analogical Transfer of Tool Use in Toddlers Is Immune to Delay.
解决问题的灵活性:幼儿工具使用的类比迁移不受延迟影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 6;11:573730. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573730. eCollection 2020.
4
Materials count: Linear-spatial materials improve young children's addition strategies and accuracy, irregular arrays don't.材料数量:线性空间材料可提高幼儿的加法策略和准确性,不规则数组则不行。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 31;13(12):e0208832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208832. eCollection 2018.
5
Accessing the Inaccessible: Redefining Play as a Spectrum.触及不可触及之物:将玩耍重新定义为一个连续体。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 2;9:1124. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01124. eCollection 2018.