Davey V A, Biederman G B
Division of Life Sciences, University of Toronto, Scarborough, Ontario, Canada.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1996 Jul;22(3):235-43. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.22.3.235.
Heat was found to be effective as a conditional stimulus in the aversion failure procedure (S. Revusky, H. K. Taukulis, L. A. Parker, & S. Coombes, 1979) and was also found to be effective as an unconditional stimulus using a taste aversion procedure in which rats exposed to high ambient temperature following saccharin consumption showed robust saccharin aversions relative to unpaired and unheated controls. The antisickness and taste aversion conditioning evidence force reexamination of the view that toxic heat effects are referred to the external environment. Together with other recent evidence from this laboratory, these data support the hypothetical antisickness mechanism of aversion failure, which requires that toxic heat serve as an internal stimulus.
在厌恶失败程序中(S. 雷夫斯基、H. K. 陶库利斯、L. A. 帕克和S. 库姆斯,1979年),热被发现作为一种条件刺激是有效的,并且在味觉厌恶程序中作为无条件刺激也被发现是有效的,在该程序中,食用糖精后暴露于高环境温度的大鼠相对于未配对和未加热的对照组表现出强烈的糖精厌恶。抗恶心和味觉厌恶条件作用的证据促使人们重新审视有毒热效应被归因于外部环境的观点。与该实验室最近的其他证据一起,这些数据支持了厌恶失败的假设性抗恶心机制,该机制要求有毒热作为一种内部刺激。