Maroldi R, Battaglia G, Maculotti P, Farina D, Milesi F, Chiesa A
Cattedra di Radiologia, Università di Brescia.
Radiol Med. 1996 May;91(5):590-5.
This study was aimed at investigating the role of CT in the surgical planning (partial vs. total laryngectomy) of supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma. Sixty-nine patients affected with supraglottic cancers were reviewed to assess the accuracy and the clinical role of CT and laryngoscopy. The detection rates of tumor spread to the glottis, to thyroid and arytenoid cartilages, pyriform sinus and base of the tongue were compared and correlated with surgical and pathologic data. Thirty-one patients underwent supraglottic laryngectomy and 38 had total laryngectomy. Endoscopy correctly assessed the glottis in 54/69 patients (78.2%) and CT in 52/69 (75.3%). The two techniques were in agreement in 47/69 patients: 42/47 (89.4%) had a correct diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values in assessing neoplastic invasion at the glottic level were, respectively, 68.4%, 90.3%, 78.2%, 89.6%, 94.1% and 86.6% when endoscopy and CT were in agreement. In deciding the feasibility of supraglottic laryngectomy, the results of endoscopy alone did not differ significantly from those of CT and endoscopy in agreement (X2 = 3.255, p > 0.05), whereas the negative predictive value of CT was significantly lower than that of the two techniques in agreement (X2 = 4.55, 0.05 > p > 0.025). In our experience, CT did not significantly change the surgical treatment planned on the basis of endoscopic findings. Therefore, when assessing the feasibility of partial laryngectomy for supraglottic carcinoma, CT cannot be considered a cost-effective tool. Nine of 33 (27.2%) patients treated with total laryngectomy had local recurrences at the hypopharynx, probably because the primary tumor was underestimated at both preoperative staging and during surgery.
本研究旨在探讨CT在声门上型喉癌手术规划(部分喉切除术与全喉切除术)中的作用。回顾了69例声门上型癌症患者,以评估CT和喉镜检查的准确性及临床作用。比较了肿瘤扩散至声门、甲状腺和杓状软骨、梨状窝及舌根的检出率,并与手术和病理数据进行关联分析。31例患者接受了声门上喉切除术,38例进行了全喉切除术。内镜检查在69例患者中的54例(78.2%)正确评估了声门,CT在69例中的52例(75.3%)正确评估了声门。两种技术在69例患者中的47例结果一致:47例中的42例(89.4%)诊断正确。在内镜检查和CT结果一致时,评估声门水平肿瘤侵犯的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为68.4%、90.3%、78.2%、89.6%、94.1%和86.6%。在决定声门上喉切除术的可行性时,单纯内镜检查的结果与内镜检查和CT结果一致时无显著差异(X2 = 3.255,p > 0.05),而CT的阴性预测值显著低于两种技术结果一致时(X2 = 4.55,0.05 > p > 0.025)。根据我们的经验,CT并未显著改变基于内镜检查结果所规划的手术治疗方案。因此,在评估声门上型癌行部分喉切除术的可行性时,CT不能被视为一种具有成本效益的工具。33例接受全喉切除术的患者中有9例(27.2%)在下咽部出现局部复发,可能是因为在术前分期及手术过程中对原发肿瘤估计不足。