Bassett G W, Jenkins-Smith H C, Silva C
Department of Economics (m/c 144), University of Illinois at Chicago 60607-7121, USA.
Risk Anal. 1996 Jun;16(3):309-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb01465.x.
No public policy issue has been as difficult as high-level nuclear waste. Debates continue regarding Yucca Mountain as a disposal site, and-more generally-the appropriateness of geologic disposal and the need to act quickly. Previous research has focused on possible social, political, and economic consequences of a facility in Nevada. Impacts have been predicted to be potentially large and to emanate mainly from stigmatization of the region due to increased perceptions of risk. Analogous impacts from leaving waste at power plants have been either ignored or assumed to be negligible. This paper presents survey results on attitudes of residents in three counties where nuclear waste is currently stored. Topics include perceived risk, knowledge of nuclear waste and radiation, and impacts on jobs, tourism, and housing values from leaving waste on site. Results are similar to what has been reported for Nevada; the public is concerned about possible adverse effects from on-site storage of waste.
没有哪个公共政策问题像高放核废料那样棘手。关于尤卡山作为处置场地的争论仍在继续,更广泛地说,还有关于地质处置的适宜性以及迅速采取行动的必要性的争论。以往的研究集中在内华达州建设一个处置设施可能产生的社会、政治和经济后果。预计影响可能很大,主要源于该地区因风险认知增加而受到的污名化。而将废料留在发电厂所产生的类似影响要么被忽视,要么被认为微不足道。本文展示了对目前存放核废料的三个县居民态度的调查结果。主题包括感知到的风险、对核废料和辐射的了解,以及废料留在原地对就业、旅游业和住房价值的影响。结果与内华达州的报告类似;公众担心废料现场储存可能产生的不利影响。