Steurer G, Yang P, Rao V, Mohl W, Glogar D, Smetana R
Department of Cardiology, University of Vienna Medical School, Austria.
Am Heart J. 1996 Aug;132(2 Pt 2 Su):478-82; discussion 496-502. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(96)90339-7.
The concept of reperfusion-induced injury has aroused special interest during the past decade as thrombolysis and direct angioplasty were introduced for early restoration of coronary blood flow in patients with acute myocardial infarction. There is experimental and clinical evidence that oxygen-derived free radicals (oxyradical hypothesis), activation of the complement system (complement hypothesis), and disturbance in calcium homeostasis (calcium hypothesis), may account for the development of reperfusion injury. Data from numerous animal experiments and clinical trials suggest that magnesium, a physiologic calcium blocker, may be efficacious for reduction of reperfusion injury. Despite encouraging results from previous clinical trials that revealed beneficial effects of intravenous magnesium therapy with respect to mortality, left ventricular function, and infarct size, a recently published large-scale trial (ISIS-4) provided conflicting data and caused major controversy. Further clinical trials, well-designed and carefully conducted, should elucidate the beneficial effects of magnesium in acute myocardial infarction, especially in conjunction with new and aggressive reperfusion techniques.
