Dunne C A, Thompson P W, Cole J, Dunning J, Martyn C N, Coggon D, Cooper C
Department of Rheumatology, Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.
Ann Rheum Dis. 1996 Jun;55(6):396-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.55.6.396.
To compare median nerve conduction velocity measured using a new, portable electroneurometer with measurements made using conventional hospital nerve conduction apparatus.
Twenty five patients were studied who were consecutively referred to a hospital neurophysiology department with a clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Sensory and motor latencies for the median nerve at the wrist were measured bilaterally using the portable electroneurometer and a Medilec MS 92 hospital apparatus operated by a trained technician.
There was strong agreement between motor latency values obtained by the two techniques (r = 0.89, p < 0.001; mean difference -0.03 ms, limits of agreement -0.33 to 0.27 ms). Sensory latencies were less easy to detect with the electroneurometer, and correlated less well with the hospital apparatus (r = 0.78, p < 0.001; mean difference -0.16 ms, limits of agreement -0.50 to 0.18 ms).
The portable electroneurometer provides a convenient, rapid, and inexpensive means of assessing median nerve conduction velocity at the wrist. Measurements of motor latency obtained with this new instrument agree more strongly with those made by conventional apparatus than do measurements of sensory latency. Although the utility of the instrument in clinical practice will be limited, it provides a helpful tool in epidemiological studies of carpal tunnel syndrome.
比较使用新型便携式神经电刺激仪测量的正中神经传导速度与使用传统医院神经传导设备测量的结果。
对连续转诊至医院神经生理学部门、临床诊断为腕管综合征的25例患者进行研究。由一名训练有素的技术人员使用便携式神经电刺激仪和Medilec MS 92医院设备双侧测量腕部正中神经的感觉和运动潜伏期。
两种技术获得的运动潜伏期值之间存在高度一致性(r = 0.89,p < 0.001;平均差异-0.03 ms,一致性界限-0.33至0.27 ms)。使用神经电刺激仪检测感觉潜伏期较困难,与医院设备的相关性也较差(r = 0.78,p < 0.001;平均差异-0.16 ms,一致性界限-0.50至0.18 ms)。
便携式神经电刺激仪提供了一种方便、快速且廉价的评估腕部正中神经传导速度的方法。用这种新仪器获得的运动潜伏期测量值与传统设备的测量值相比,比感觉潜伏期测量值的一致性更强。尽管该仪器在临床实践中的实用性有限,但它为腕管综合征的流行病学研究提供了一个有用的工具。