• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Antithrombotic strategy after total hip replacement. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing prolonged oral anticoagulants with screening for deep vein thrombosis.

作者信息

Sarasin F P, Bounameaux H

机构信息

Clinique de Médecine 1, Hôpital Cantonal, University of Geneva, Switzerland Medical School.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(15):1661-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.156.15.1661.

DOI:10.1001/archinte.156.15.1661
PMID:8694664
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the lower limbs is a major postoperative complication in patients undergoing total hip replacement. However, even with the most effective perioperative antithrombotic prophylactic methods, its incidence at the time of hospital discharge remains as high as 15 to 25.

METHODS

We used a decision analysis model to determine the clinical and economic effects of the following interventions: (1) stopping prophylactic antithrombotic therapy after the in-hospital perioperative period (7-14 days), (2) extending prophylactic antithrombotic therapy with oral anticoagulants up to 6 weeks or 3 months, and (3) screening for DVT at the time of hospital discharge by compression ultrasonography or venography. We measured for a hypothetical cohort of 10 000 patients the risk of developing recurrent DVT and symptomatic pulmonary embolism, the risk of major bleeding complications, and the costs associated with each strategy. Data were drawn from the published literature (MEDLINE search) and from our hospital cost manager.

RESULTS

Compared with stopping prophylaxis at the time of hospital discharge, a 6-week course of prophylactic oral anticoagulant therapy would reduce the number of cases of recurrent DVT from 1172 to 493 and the number of symptomatic pulmonary embolisms from 234 to 99, and would be less costly. This gain would be achieved at the cost of 29 major bleeding complications if the bleeding risk is low (0.2 per month) and 71 if the bleeding risk is moderate (0.5 per month). Compared with stopping prophylaxis at discharge, ultrasound screening would reduce symptomatic pulmonary embolisms from 234 to 142, induce only 13 major bleeding episodes, and be cost-effective, with marginal costs per additional pulmonary embolism averted ranging from $3000 to $7000, depending on ultrasound sensitivity. Venography screening would be the most effective strategy; however, compared with ultrasound, its marginal costs per additional pulmonary embolism averted would exceed $80 000.

CONCLUSIONS

After hip replacement with conventional perioperative antithrombotic prophylaxis, oral anticoagulation administered for 6 weeks is effective in preventing recurrent DVT and symptomatic pulmonary embolism, unless the bleeding risk is very high. Moreover, this strategy is less costly compared with stopping antithrombotic prophylaxis at the time of hospital discharge. Alternatively, ultrasound screening is also effective, minimizes the risks of bleeding, and has a low marginal cost-effectiveness ratio.

摘要

相似文献

1
Antithrombotic strategy after total hip replacement. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing prolonged oral anticoagulants with screening for deep vein thrombosis.
Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(15):1661-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.156.15.1661.
2
Out of hospital antithrombotic prophylaxis after total hip replacement: low-molecular-weight heparin, warfarin, aspirin or nothing? A cost-effectiveness analysis.全髋关节置换术后院外抗血栓预防:低分子量肝素、华法林、阿司匹林还是不进行预防?成本效益分析。
Thromb Haemost. 2002 Apr;87(4):586-92.
3
Screening for proximal deep venous thrombosis using B-mode venous ultrasonography following major hip surgery: implications for clinical management.
Vasa. 1994;23(4):330-6.
4
Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic anticoagulation prolonged after hospital discharge following general surgery.普通外科出院后延长预防性抗凝治疗的成本效益
Arch Surg. 1996 Jul;131(7):694-7; discussion 698. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430190016003.
5
Extended dalteparin prophylaxis for venous thromboembolic events: cost-utility analysis in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery.达肝素延长预防静脉血栓栓塞事件:大型骨科手术患者的成本效益分析
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2009;9(1):45-58. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200909010-00005.
6
Prolonged enoxaparin therapy to prevent venous thromboembolism after primary hip or knee replacement. A cost-utility analysis.延长依诺肝素治疗以预防初次髋关节或膝关节置换术后静脉血栓栓塞。一项成本效益分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004 Oct;124(8):507-17. doi: 10.1007/s00402-004-0720-3. Epub 2004 Sep 10.
7
Risk of deep-venous thrombosis after hospital discharge in patients having undergone total hip replacement: double-blind randomised comparison of enoxaparin versus placebo.全髋关节置换术后患者出院后深静脉血栓形成的风险:依诺肝素与安慰剂的双盲随机对照比较
Lancet. 1996 Jul 27;348(9022):224-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)01453-5.
8
Subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin vs warfarin for prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis after hip or knee implantation. An economic perspective.皮下注射低分子量肝素与华法林预防髋或膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓形成的经济学视角
Arch Intern Med. 1997 Feb 10;157(3):298-303.
9
Pharmacoeconomic model of enoxaparin versus heparin for prevention of deep vein thrombosis after total hip replacement.依诺肝素与肝素预防全髋关节置换术后深静脉血栓形成的药物经济学模型
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1997 May 15;54(10):1185-90. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/54.10.1185.
10
Cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin vs low-dose warfarin in the prevention of deep-vein thrombosis after total hip replacement surgery.依诺肝素与低剂量华法林预防全髋关节置换术后深静脉血栓形成的成本效益分析
Arch Intern Med. 1995 Apr 10;155(7):757-64.

引用本文的文献

1
[Intermittent compression devices for swelling reduction and thrombosis prophylaxis--a pilot study after total hip replacement. Is the 2 hour daily minimum application sufficient?].
Unfallchirurg. 2006 Sep;109(9):786-92. doi: 10.1007/s00113-006-1140-3.