• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床医生会使用诊断标签来指导干预措施的选择吗?

Do clinicians use diagnostic labels to direct intervention selection?

作者信息

Chase S, Leuner J D

出版信息

Nurs Diagn. 1996 Jan-Mar;7(1):33-9.

PMID:8695299
Abstract

The authors report a descriptive, correlational study that evaluated the relationship between accuracy in selecting diagnostic labels and nursing interventions, and the relationship between accuracy in selecting outcome statements and nursing interventions. An instrument developed by the authors was used, based on previously published case studies. For two case studies, respondents (N = 17) were asked to indicate how important the nursing problem, the intervention, and the outcome statement would be in patient care. No relationship between accuracy in diagnostic label selection and accuracy in intervention selection was found. A positive correlation between accuracy in outcome selection and accuracy in intervention selection was found for one of the cases.

摘要

作者报告了一项描述性、相关性研究,该研究评估了选择诊断标签的准确性与护理干预之间的关系,以及选择结果陈述的准确性与护理干预之间的关系。作者基于之前发表的案例研究开发了一种工具。对于两个案例研究,要求受访者(N = 17)指出护理问题、干预措施和结果陈述在患者护理中的重要性。未发现诊断标签选择的准确性与干预选择的准确性之间存在关联。在其中一个案例中,发现结果选择的准确性与干预选择的准确性之间存在正相关。

相似文献

1
Do clinicians use diagnostic labels to direct intervention selection?临床医生会使用诊断标签来指导干预措施的选择吗?
Nurs Diagn. 1996 Jan-Mar;7(1):33-9.
2
Evaluation of the implementation of nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes.护理诊断、干预措施及结果实施情况的评估。
Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2009 Jan-Mar;20(1):9-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618X.2008.01108.x.
3
[Standardizing care. When the intervention is valid].[规范护理。当干预措施有效时]
Rev Enferm. 1997 Jul-Aug;20(227-8):23-31.
4
Contamination: nursing diagnoses with outcome and intervention linkages.污染:具有结果和干预关联的护理诊断
Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2007 Apr-Jun;18(2):37-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618X.2007.00048.x.
5
[Nursing diagnosis. Keys for its development].[护理诊断。其形成的关键]
Rev Enferm. 1999 Jul-Aug;22(7-8):554-8.
6
Development of an instrument to measure the quality of documented nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes: the Q-DIO.一种用于测量记录的护理诊断、干预措施和结果质量的工具的开发:质量驱动的护理结果量表(Q-DIO)
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Apr;18(7):1027-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02603.x. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
7
Nursing diagnoses: factors affecting their use in charting standardized care plans.护理诊断:影响其在标准化护理计划图表中使用的因素。
J Clin Nurs. 2005 May;14(5):640-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00909.x.
8
Meeting the criteria of a nursing diagnosis classification: Evaluation of ICNP, ICF, NANDA and ZEFP.符合护理诊断分类标准:对国际护理实践分类法(ICNP)、国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)、北美护理诊断协会(NANDA)及德国护理诊断分类法(ZEFP)的评估。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Jul;44(5):702-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.02.001. Epub 2006 Mar 23.
9
Quality of nursing diagnoses: evaluation of an educational intervention.护理诊断质量:一项教育干预措施的评估
Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2005 Apr-Jun;16(2):33-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618X.2005.00008.x.
10
The Omaha System: a model for describing school nurse case management.奥马哈系统:一种描述学校护士病例管理的模式。
J Sch Nurs. 1998 Aug;14(3):24-30.